Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (2005) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix J: Association of Added Sugar Intake and Intake of Other Nutrients
Appendix J: Association of Added Sugar Intake and Intake of Other Nutrients
Pages 1203-1225
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 1203... ...
J Association of Added Sugars Intake and Intake of Other Nutrients 1203
|
From page 1204... ...
0 0 0 0 Vitamin A, RAE 684 722 715 778 Standard error 32 19 13 26 Comparison abcdef abcde abcde abcd Percent < EAR (275 µg/d) 0.4 0 0.9 0.1 Vitamin E, mg -tocopherold 4.6 5.9 5.3 5.5 Standard error 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 Comparison aefg bcd bcde bcde Percent < EAR (6 mg/d)
|
From page 1205... ...
Standard errors were estimated via jackknife replication. Each standard error has 49 degrees of freedom.
|
From page 1206... ...
8.0 0 0.2 15.4 Vitamin A, RAE 808 757 764 730 Standard error 49 39 38 35 Comparison abcdefgh abcdefgh abcdefgh abcdefgh Percent < EAR (445 µg/d) 9.6 3.1 3.2 14.6 Vitamin E, mg -tocopherolc 5.9 6.8 7.7 6.7 Standard error 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 Comparison abdefgh abcdefg bcdeg abcdefg Percent < EAR (9 mg/d)
|
From page 1207... ...
Standard errors were estimated via jackknife replication. Each standard error has 49 degrees of freedom.
|
From page 1208... ...
99 100 86 45 Iron, mg 16.6 18.9 19.0 23.4 Standard error 0.8 0.9 0.7 1.4 Comparison abdefg abcdefg abcdef bcdef Percent < EAR (7.7 mg/d) 0 0.3 0 0 Zinc, mg 14.2 15.4 15.0 18.9 Standard error 0.7 0.8 0.6 1.4 Comparison abcdef abcdef abcd abcdef Percent < EAR (8.5 mg/d)
|
From page 1209... ...
Standard errors were estimated via jackknife replication. Each standard error has 49 degrees of freedom.
|
From page 1210... ...
370 401 400 339 Standard error 7 7 8 7 Comparison abc abc abc defg Percent < EAR (350 mg/d) 42 29 11 57 Vitamin A, RAE 737 694 953 764 Standard error 31 19 27 22 Comparison abdef abdef c abdef Percent < EAR (625 µg/d)
|
From page 1211... ...
APPENDIX J 1211 20 < x 25 < x 30 < x 25% 30% 35% > 35% 565 312 190 173 917 912 798 624 21 30 37 27 adefg adefg aefg h 36 15 31 2.7 304 287 265 217 7 12 12 9 efg efg efgh gh 63 72 76 91 321 321 308 236 7 9 14 17 defg defg defg h 62 68 71 82 725 682 409 360 26 40 26 27 abdef abdef gh gh 35 43 73 85 8.5 7.5 7.2 5.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 ae afg afg h 92 98 100 99 17.1 16.0 14.1 11.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.6 aef aefg fg h 0 <0.05 2.6 3.1 continued
|
From page 1212... ...
Estimates of nutrient intake were adjusted using the Iowa State University method and data from the subsample of individuals with Day 2 recalls
|
From page 1213... ...
Standard errors were estimated via jackknife replication. Each standard error has 49 degrees of freedom.
|
From page 1214... ...
54 54.2 61 65 Vitamin A, RAE 698 811 879 842 Standard error 24 23 28 28 Comparison aefg bcdefg bcdef bcdefg Percent < EAR (625 µg/d) 43 29 20 28 Vitamin E, mg -tocopherolc 7.2 7.2 8.5 7.6 Standard error 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Comparison abdef abdef cde abcdef Percent < EAR (12 mg/d)
|
From page 1215... ...
Standard errors were estimated via jackknife replication. Each standard error has 49 degrees of freedom.
|
From page 1216... ...
97 80 97 89 Iron, mg 15.7 15.8 13.5 13.2 Standard error 6.1 0.6 0.5 0.5 Comparison abcdefgh abg acdeg acdeg Percent < EAR (5.7 mg/d) 1.9 0 0 0.2 Zinc, mg 10.7 10.5 9.3 9.8 Standard error 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 Comparison abcdg abcdg abcdeg abcdeg Percent < EAR (7 mg/d)
|
From page 1217... ...
Standard errors were estimated via jackknife replication. Each standard error has 49 degrees of freedom.
|
From page 1218... ...
99 100 100 69 Iron, mg 12.7 12.5 14.2 13.9 Standard error 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.5 Comparison abcdef abcde abcde abcde Percent < EAR (7.9 mg/d) 6.9 15 0.7 0.2 Zinc, mg 8.3 9.8 10.8 9.8 Standard error 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 Comparison abdefg abcdef bcde abcdef Percent < EAR (3.0 mg/d)
|
From page 1219... ...
Standard errors were estimated via jackknife replication. Each standard error has 49 degrees of freedom.
|
From page 1220... ...
231 254 254 260 Standard error 7 6 6 7 Comparison abcdef abcde abcde abcd Percent < EAR (255 mg/d) 65 50 51 48 Magnesium, mg (3150 y)
|
From page 1221... ...
APPENDIX J 1221 20 < x 25 < x 30 < x 25% 30% 35% > 35% 648 455 253 326 650 607 542 404 15 17 19 17 aef aefg fg h 6.6 9.3 3.5 0.3 229 210 184 156 6 6 7 8 abcef aefg fgh gh 78 84 83 99 226 212 180 145 5 6 7 6 ef ef g h 86 84 94 100 480 491 395 294 16 21 24 19 adefg adefg efg h 55 51 71 86 5.5 5.3 4.8 3.6 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 efg efg efg h 99 97 99 100 11.6 11.3 10.0 7.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 aef aefg fg h 9.5 11.5 29 63 continued
|
From page 1222... ...
Estimates of nutrient intake were adjusted using the Iowa State University method and data from the subsample of individuals with Day 2 recalls
|
From page 1223... ...
Standard errors were estimated via jackknife replication. Each standard error has 49 degrees of freedom.
|
From page 1224... ...
98 90 99 95 Iron, mg 11.1 12.4 12.4 12.1 Standard error 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 Comparison adef bcd bcd abcdf Percent < EAR (5 mg/d) 1.1 1.2 0.2 0.8 Zinc, mg 8.0 8.8 8.8 8.2 Standard error 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Comparison adef bcd bcd abcdf Percent < EAR (6.8 mg/d)
|
From page 1225... ...
Standard errors were estimated via jackknife replication. Each standard error has 49 degrees of freedom.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.