The National Academies Press

Currently Skimming:

Appendix D: Dietary Intake Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), 1988-1994
Pages 988-1027

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.

From page 988... ... , United States, NHANES III (1988�1994) Percentile Sex/Age Categorya n Mean 1st 5th 10th Both sexes, 2�3 y 2,174 13.2 0.4 1.8 3.4 Both sexes, 4�8 y 3,448 19.3 9.3 11.7 13.1 Standard error 0.4 2.2 1.9 1.6 M, 9�13 y 1,219 28.6 16.8 19.7 21.4 Standard error 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.7 M, 14�18 y 909 36.9 15.5 20.5 23.4 Standard error 1.4 13.8 11.1 9.3 M, 19�30 y 1,902 31.5 10.7 15.3 18.1 Standard error 0.8 2.6 2.4 2.1 M, 31�50 y 2,533 25.4 3.5 6.9 9.5 Standard error 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 M, 51�70 y 1,942 18.0 3.1 5.5 7.2 Standard error 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 M, 71+ y 1,255 14.3 3.9 5.8 7.1 Standard error 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.8 F, 9�13 y 1,216 21.9 9.3 12.1 13.8 Standard error 0.7 1.7 1.5 1.3 F, 14�18 y 949 25.4 9.0 12.6 14.8 Standard error 1.2 5.5 4.8 4.2 F, 19�30 y 1,901 22.3 4.8 8.0 10.2 Standard error 0.7 1.4 1.6 1.4 988 Read the entire page →
From page 989... ... 25th 50th 75th 90th 95th 99th 6.8 10.9 17.7 25.3 30.9 45.5 15.6 18.9 22.4 26.0 28.3 33.0 1.1 0.4 0.9 2.0 2.7 4.3 24.5 28.2 32.3 36.3 38.9 44.1 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.7 28.9 35.7 43.5 51.8 57.3 69.1 6.0 1.9 4.5 10.6 14.9 24.4 23.5 30.3 38.1 46.4 51.9 63.6 1.6 0.9 1.4 2.9 4.1 7.0 15.0 22.8 33.0 44.2 52.2 70.9 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.6 2.3 4.6 10.8 16.2 23.2 31.2 36.8 49.2 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.1 1.5 2.9 9.7 13.3 17.8 22.7 26.0 33.1 0.6 0.4 0.7 1.5 2.1 3.5 17.0 21.1 25.9 30.9 34.3 41.6 1.1 0.8 1.1 1.8 2.5 4.2 18.9 24.3 30.6 37.3 41.8 51.4 2.9 1.4 2.5 5.5 7.8 13.3 14.6 20.8 28.4 36.6 42.1 53.9 1.1 0.7 1.1 2.0 2.9 4.8 continued 989 Read the entire page →
From page 990... ... The mean and percentiles for this group were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 991... ... SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 992... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 993... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 994... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 995... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 996... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 997... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 998... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 999... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 1000... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 1001... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 1002... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 1003... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 1004... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 1005... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 1006... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 1007... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 1008... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 1009... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 1010... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 1011... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 1012... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 1013... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 1014... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 1015... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 1016... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 1017... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 1018... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 1019... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 1020... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 1021... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 1022... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 1023... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 1024... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 1025... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →
From page 1026... ... Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Read the entire page →
From page 1027... ... . SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics, 2001. Read the entire page →

From page 988...

... , United States, NHANES III (1988�1994) Percentile Sex/Age Categorya n Mean 1st 5th 10th Both sexes, 2�3 y 2,174 13.2 0.4 1.8 3.4 Both sexes, 4�8 y 3,448 19.3 9.3 11.7 13.1 Standard error 0.4 2.2 1.9 1.6 M, 9�13 y 1,219 28.6 16.8 19.7 21.4 Standard error 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.7 M, 14�18 y 909 36.9 15.5 20.5 23.4 Standard error 1.4 13.8 11.1 9.3 M, 19�30 y 1,902 31.5 10.7 15.3 18.1 Standard error 0.8 2.6 2.4 2.1 M, 31�50 y 2,533 25.4 3.5 6.9 9.5 Standard error 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 M, 51�70 y 1,942 18.0 3.1 5.5 7.2 Standard error 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 M, 71+ y 1,255 14.3 3.9 5.8 7.1 Standard error 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.8 F, 9�13 y 1,216 21.9 9.3 12.1 13.8 Standard error 0.7 1.7 1.5 1.3 F, 14�18 y 949 25.4 9.0 12.6 14.8 Standard error 1.2 5.5 4.8 4.2 F, 19�30 y 1,901 22.3 4.8 8.0 10.2 Standard error 0.7 1.4 1.6 1.4 988

Appendix D: Dietary Intake Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), 1988-1994 Pages 988-1027

Appendix D: Dietary Intake Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), 1988-1994
Pages 988-1027