Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix B: Force Exchange Ratio, Historical Win Probability, and Winning with Decisive Force
Pages 105-108

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 105...
... The historical data, contained in the CAA Data Base of Battles (1991 version, CDB91) is from a wide range of battle types durations ranging from hours to weeks, dates ranging from the 1600s to the late 20th century, and forces involving a variety of nationalities.
From page 106...
... National Military Strategy (NMS) codified a new military success objective: "Apply decisive force to win swiftly and minimize casualties." The NMS also implied that decisive force will be used to minimize risks associated with regional conflicts.
From page 107...
... Objectives are to conduct a defense to prevent the aggressor from capturing critical ports and airfields in Saudi Arabia and to then conduct a counteroffensive to regain lost territory and restore national boundaries. The FER-coalition casualty relationship shown in the figure is based on simulation results, in which the FER is the ratio of the percentage of enemy losses to the percentage of coalition losses.
From page 108...
... _ to o .~ o ~ ._ to Pr (win) = .505 IMPROVED OPERATIONAL TESTING AND EVALUATION Aggressor achieves military objectives Coalition objectives achieved, casualties high 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 .846 .937 .968 .981 Force Exchange Ratio FIGURE B-3 Force exchange ratio and decisive warfighting capability.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.