Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

3. Intellectual Property - When Is It the Best Incentive Mechanism for S&T Data and Information?
Pages 15-18

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 15...
... The third wrong answer is that "the private sector is more efficient than the public sector." The fourth is that, "without intellectual property, even public domain inventions will not be used efficiently" the Bayh-Dole argument. Consider the first wrong answer, that otherwise we won't get inventions.
From page 16...
... Increasingly, even the discoveries that are publicly funded are restricted by intellectual property, e.g., the many discoveries made in national laboratories funded by the Department of Energy. Wrong answer number two is that "intellectual property rewards inventors, and doesn't hurt users provided it is licensed." It is true that intellectual property rewards inventors, and may even be an important engine of growth and of invention.
From page 17...
... These are prize systems, and they are very good at inciting effort. Whether there is a disparity between the effort that such funding incites, and the effort incited under intellectual property rights, is a nuanced question.
From page 18...
... There are many realms of scientific inquiry, especially those that are closely tied to industry and industrial development, that we would not want to put under the jurisdiction of a public sponsor. Under intellectual property rights, the private sector will apply at least a weak test of whether an R&D investment is worth the cost, namely, whether it is likely to turn a profit.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.