Skip to main content

Measuring What Matters Allocation, Planning, and Quality Assessment for the Ryan White CARE Act (2004) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

Appendix B: Financial Resources of States for HIV/AIDS Reporting
Pages 239-246

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 239...
... Even though HIV and AIDS data are perceived to be readily available for RWCA purposes at no additional cost, states must often provide specialized reports for RWCA planning that include different or more-detailed data than are provided in standard epidemiologic reports.1 Such efforts can be costly. 1 Subcommittee site visit to the CDC, April 4, 2002.
Read the entire page →
From page 240...
... CDC provides additional funds to states, based on a competitive grant application process, for supplemental surveillance activities. 3States were asked not to include state general revenue contributions to the six cities/ counties in their jurisdiction that receive direct funding from CDC for HIV/AIDS reporting (Chicago, Houston, New York, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, and San Francisco)
Read the entire page →
From page 241...
... Pennsylvania began general revenue contributions prior to implementing HIV reporting, but Kansas discontinued general revenue contributions the year following implementation of HIV reporting. Federal funding increased for Vermont, Hawaii, Alaska, and Kansas during this period, but was essentially flat for other states.
Read the entire page →
From page 242...
... 572,603 Not Available 786,712 Alaska 0 115,000 0 115,000 Arizona 125,000 340,573 125,000 398,133 Arkansas 0 238,727 0 207,653 Californiaa 5,116,200 3,914,875 7,746,000 4,058,017 Colorado 0 537,822 0 467,772 Connecticut Not Available 346,444 Not Available 298,319 Delaware 0 112,664 0 113,005 District of Columbia Not Available 388,336 Not Available 485,865 Florida 634,227 1,806,242 634,227 1,760,761 Georgia 0 196,816 0 297,909 Hawaii 0 31,505 0 135,989 Idaho 0 75,000 0 75,000 Illinois Not Available 1,010,508b Not Available 1,409,531b Indiana 0 274,633 0 280,708 Iowa 0 29,476 0 129,151 Kansas 42,900 90,200 42,900 127,301 Kentucky 0 109,852 0 117,000 Louisiana 7,500 772,966 7,500 774,042 Maine 0 112,947 0 72,319 Maryland Not Available 956,359 Not Available 956,359 Massachusetts 0 226,901 0 483,925 Michigan 0 851,426 0 881,745 Minnesota 0 189,568 0 232,345 Mississippi 0 243,071 0 220,000 Missouri 0 550,203 0 577,455 Montana 0 68,105 0 67,124 Nebraska 0 83,635 0 120,000 Nevada Not Available 310,600 Not Available 327,494 New Hampshire Not Available 83,200 Not Available 77,985 New Jersey 616,000 2,202,177 553,000 2,089,025 New Mexico Not Available 163,320 Not Available 213,479 New York 1,607,028 4,525,303c 1,809,183 4,394,123c North Carolina 0 406,125 0 1,292d North Dakota 0 59,675 0 59,251 Ohio 0 176,228 0 399,052 Oklahoma 0 286,509 0 286,509 Oregon Not Available 330,108 Not Available 320,108 Pennsylvania 0 1,079,110e 0 1,092,184e Rhode Island Not Available 213,218 Not Available 214,304 South Carolina 0 446,217 0 486,314
Read the entire page →
From page 243...
... APPENDIX B 243 FY2001 FY2002 State General Federal State General Federal Revenue (in $) Revenue (in $)
Read the entire page →
From page 244...
... South Dakota 0 52,048 0 54,404 Tennessee 0 526,858 0 505,200 Texas 263,006 1,627,176f 263,006 1,401,897f Utah 0 115,481 0 141,092 Vermont 0 64,294 0 75,056 Virginia 0 339,806 0 423,268 Washington 0 748,702 0 760,952 West Virginia 0 182,351 0 204,419 Wisconsin 0 342,445 0 342,445 Wyoming 0 52,690 0 52,689 aIncludes funding for Los Angeles and San Francisco. bIncludes funding for Chicago.
Read the entire page →
From page 245...
... 0 47,024 0 44,454 0 581,102 0 616,100 268,872 1,308,762f 268,872 1,086,330f 0 168,719 0 179,268 0 128,832 0 82,526 0 444,332 0 393,084 0 802,181 0 770,510 0 199,627 0 225,750 0 383,851 0 341,914 0 51,555 0 57,954 TABLE B-3 State and Core Federal Funding for Surveillance by States Implementing HIV Surveillance per 1,000 Adult Population, FY1999­ 2002, by State (N = 11) State Funding (in $)
Read the entire page →
From page 246...
... State dependence upon federal funding for HIV surveillance activity, and for the provision of HIV/AIDS data for RWCA planning, evaluation, and allocation is apparent. The use of financial data to understand capacity has limitations.
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • surveillance programs
  • revenue contributions
  • hiv surveillance
  • state funding
  • rwca planning

  • implementing hiv
  • white care
  • surveillance activities
  • surveillance capacity
  • ryan white

  • state contributions
  • care act
  • state aids
  • incremental costs
  • implemented hiv

  • reporting activities
  • core surveillance
  • surveillance funding
  • aids directors
  • additional funds

  • states implemented
  • financial data
  • items consumer
  • implementing specific
  • grant application

  • surveillance budget
  • funding picture
  • national alliance
  • overall funding
  • additional surveillance


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.