Measuring What Matters Allocation, Planning, and Quality Assessment for the Ryan White CARE Act (2004) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix C: Analyses of the Sensitivity of the Formula Allocations to Underlying Changes in Input Data
Appendix C: Analyses of the Sensitivity of the Formula Allocations to Underlying Changes in Input Data
Pages 247-260
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 247... ...
That is, it intended to compare different factors in the funding formulas to examine the impact of including HIV cases on resource allocations across regions, and to compare the inclusion of HIV cases to other features, such as hold-harmless provisions, set-asides, minimum funding thresholds, and the potential addition of new Eligible Metropolitan Areas (EMAs) based on a more inclusive definition of HIV disease burden.
|
From page 248... ...
The Committee also employed multiple linear regression analysis to identify predictors of RWCA Title I and Title II funding. In its analyses, the Committee examined "dollar allocations per case" across jurisdictions as a point of departure.
|
From page 249... ...
. If Title I and Title II funds were provided to funding units in strict proportion to the number of ELCs, the nationwide allocations per ELC would have been: · Title I: $2,767 per ELC ($565,299,972 divided by 204,298)
|
From page 250... ...
250 CA CA , Rosa, CA , CA , Angeles Santa CA amento Los PR , nardino Sacr TX , Oakland, Ber PR Caguas NJ uan, Antonio J PR , San erside-San San Riv MO , once FL P , NJ Louis , lando CA , Or Saint CA assaic x-Somerset-Hunterdon, , CO County , r Jose NJ e , v Middlese San ange Bergen-P GA City Den Or y TX LA th, r , o Atlanta, Jerse A W W , leans Ft. FL Or NJ w k, Seattle Ne r MO a Beach, , w MI City Ne alm P CT est OH en, Detroit, W v Kansas TX Ha w eland, OR v Ne NY Cle tland, Houston, TX olk, r o P MD , ustin, ELC.
|
From page 251... ...
Combined estimated prevalence for the 50 states, DC, and Puerto Rico was 651,238 cases, with 449,898 of these cases associated with a specific EMA. If Title I and Title II funds were provided in strict proportion to the total estimated HIV and AIDS prevalence, the nationwide allocations per case would be: · Title I: $1,256 ($565,229,972 divided by 449,898)
|
From page 252... ...
252 CO , r MN e v OR aul, Den P MO , tland, CT r City o P A en, W v A , V Ha w Kansas Minneapolis-St. FL , olk, Seattle Ne DC ville Norf FL kson c TX a J th, OH r o Beach, ashington, W TX W alm P TX eland, Ft.
|
From page 253... ...
Because every state receives at least $500,000 in Title II funding, some small non-EMA states receive high Title II awards per ELC. Kansas and New Hampshire have slightly lower allocations per ELC than other states, though the reasons for such variability are unclear.
|
From page 254... ...
254 MEASURING WHAT MATTERS $4,000 $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 ELC per $2,000 Dollars $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 y i ida nia Ohio izona Texas ado ania vada York Rico or VirginiaGeorgia Ar IllinoisFlor JerseOregon ylandw to Louisana Color Michigan ColumbiaNe ashington w Mar Ne Missour Minnesota Calif MassachusettsPennsylv of W Ne Puer Connecticut ict Distr FIGURE C-4 FY2001 Title II allocations per ELC in states with an EMA. $3,000 $2,500 Case $2,000 HIV/AIDS $1,500 per $1,000 Dollars $500 $0 ota ky waii ota are xico Dak yomingIdaho Utah w aska Iowa Virginia IndianaAlaskaHa Dak KansasMainekansas th W Montana KentucCarolina Carolina Ar est Tennessee DelaOklahomaWisconsin VermontIsland Nebr wMe Alabamath Mississippi Hampshire Nor W South Rhode Ne w South Nor Ne FIGURE C-5 FY2001 Title II allocations per HIV/AIDS case in states without an EMA.
|
From page 255... ...
MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS The Committee performed several cross-sectional state regressions to examine characteristics associated with FY2001 RWCA funding. These
|
From page 256... ...
256 MEASURING WHAT MATTERS $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 ELC $5,000 per $4,000 Dollars $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 i y ky IllinoisizonaaniaorNe niavada Texas ado idaYork Rico yland Ohio ware Ar Flor w to Jerse Indiana kansas Columbia Calif Missour Louisana Virginia CarolinaKentuc ict MassachusettsPennsylv of Connecticut Ne Tennessee Alabama Minnesota ColorGeorgiaNe OregonMichiganashingtonw Mar Ar thCarolinaOklahomaWisconsin Puer W MississippiDela South Nor Distr FIGURE C-7 FY2001 Total Title I and II allocations per ELC in states with more than 1,000 ELCs. $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 Case $2,000 HIV/AIDS per $1,500 Dollars $1,000 $500 $0 y i ky or niaYorkRico Ohio ado ware w idaaniaizonavada yland to JerseIllinoisTexas Flor Oregon Virginia Indiana kansas ColumbiaCalifNe w Ar Ne Georgia Missour MichiganMar Louisana ashington Alabama PuerNe Minnesota KentucCarolinaColorennesseeOklahomaWisconsin CarolinaAr Dela of Pennsylv Connecticut W T th Mississippi ict Massachusetts South Nor Distr FIGURE C-8 FY2001 Total Title I and II allocations per HIV/AIDS in states with more than 1,000 ELCs.
|
From page 257... ...
Results from African Americans are computed in an analogous fashion. As shown in Table C-1, the presence of an EMA is associated with a significant reduction in RWCA Title II funding, but is associated with a significant increase in overall (Title I plus Title II)
|
From page 258... ...
is associated with a $50 (0.136 × 365) increase in per-ELC Title I and Title II resources.
|
From page 259... ...
$(Title II) $(Title I+Title II)
|
From page 260... ...
2002b. FY2002 Ryan White CARE Act Title II Emergency Relief Grants.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.