Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate (2005) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix D: U.S. Dietary Intake Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994
Appendix D: U.S. Dietary Intake Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994
Pages 494-517
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 494... ...
: United States, NHANES III, 1988–1994 Percentile Sex/Age Categorya Mean 1st 5th 10th n Both sexes, 2–6 mo 784 1,112 443 607 707 Both sexes, 7–12 mo 809 1,324 525 768 861 Both sexes, 1–3 y 3,172 1,420 509 701 822 Both sexes, 4–8 y 3,247 1,779 1,069 1,235 1,332 Standard error 26 160 128 109 M, 9–13 y 1,188 2,535 1,211 1,495 1,669 Standard error 54 121 110 101 M, 14–18 y 891 3,400 1,765 2,118 2,333 Standard error 88 303 269 242 M, 19–30 y 1,872 3,908 1,849 2,260 2,517 Standard error 65 140 130 121 M, 31–50 y 2,495 3,848 1,632 2,094 2,380 Standard error 57 63 58 55 M, 51–70 y 1,872 3,551 1,606 2,024 2,281 Standard error 64 74 55 54 M, 71+ y 1,186 2,994 1,422 1,768 1,979 Standard error 45 64 53 46 F, 9–13 y 1,181 2,240 1,003 1,268 1,429 Standard error 49 70 61 58 F, 14–18 y 937 2,498 957 1,270 1,466 Standard error 66 80 74 74 494
|
From page 495... ...
495 APPENDIX D 25th 50th 75th 90th 95th 99th 856 1,047 1,313 1,564 1,786 2,384 1,051 1,260 1,544 1,833 2,027 2,588 1,032 1,320 1,703 2,141 2,492 3,238 1,513 1,742 2,005 2,274 2,453 2,826 76 35 49 130 200 389 2,001 2,439 2,964 3,523 3,901 4,715 82 61 77 143 200 342 2,743 3,282 3,928 4,617 5,086 6,102 180 100 150 337 488 858 3,019 3,709 4,577 5,548 6,232 7,763 101 73 88 181 267 493 2,920 3,632 4,527 5,574 6,340 8,122 50 54 78 128 178 325 2,765 3,387 4,148 5,018 5,643 7,065 56 58 91 129 187 424 2,377 2,895 3,502 4,136 4,559 5,453 35 34 64 116 158 260 1,734 2,132 2,623 3,181 3,582 4,497 52 47 65 96 139 312 1,841 2,331 2,958 3,722 4,301 5,688 70 52 80 172 287 673 continued
|
From page 496... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method to provide estimates of usual intake. Means, standard errors, and percentiles were ob
|
From page 497... ...
, 1988–1994. SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics (2003)
|
From page 498... ...
Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method to provide estimates of usual intake.
|
From page 499... ...
, 1988–1994. SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics (2003)
|
From page 500... ...
Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method to provide
|
From page 501... ...
, 1988–1994. SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics (2003)
|
From page 502... ...
Means and percentiles for these groups were computed using SAS PROC UNIVARIATE. For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method to provide estimates of usual intake.
|
From page 503... ...
, 1988–1994. SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics (2003)
|
From page 504... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Means, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using C-Side.
|
From page 505... ...
, 1988–1994. SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics (2003)
|
From page 506... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Means, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using C-Side.
|
From page 507... ...
, 1988–1994. SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics (2003)
|
From page 508... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Means, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using C-Side.
|
From page 509... ...
, 1988–1994. SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics (2003)
|
From page 510... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Means, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using C-Side.
|
From page 511... ...
, 1988–1994. SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics (2003)
|
From page 512... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Means, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using C-Side.
|
From page 513... ...
, 1988–1994. SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics (2003)
|
From page 514... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Means, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using C-Side.
|
From page 515... ...
, 1988–1994. SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics (2003)
|
From page 516... ...
For all other groups, data were adjusted using the Iowa State University method. Means, standard errors, and percentiles were obtained using C-Side.
|
From page 517... ...
, 1988–1994. SOURCE: ENVIRON International Corporation and Iowa State University Department of Statistics (2003)
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.