Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

6 Conclusions
Pages 49-50

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 49...
... From the perspective of the academic PIs, who are typically inexperienced in project management, the programmatic constraints allow little time and few resources to accommodate management missteps while preserving the proposed scientific scope of the mission. Moreover, the attention to management issues required for PI-led mission accomplishment is inconsistent with typical academic career advancement criteria (except, perhaps, for those interested in high-level university administration)
From page 50...
... The committee also believes that cost, schedule, and NASA oversight constraints on PI-led missions do not leave much room for innovative management approaches or significant creation or enhancement of space systems development infrastructures, even with the most experienced project teams. The committee thus concludes that it is unrealistic to expect the competitive AO process for PI-led missions to substantially enhance mission management capability at universities that do not already have space mission infrastructure in place.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.