Skip to main content

Redesigning the U.S. Naturalization Tests Interim Report (2004) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

2 Structure of the Redesign Program
Pages 7-11

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 7...
... Although some stakeholders may disagree with decisions about test content or use, a transparent and accountable process that also meets professional standards of good testing practice will increase the likelihood that stakeholders will view the outcome as legitimate. MULTITIERED OVERSIGHT Because of this need for political accountability and technical soundness, many highstakes testing programs whether for granting high school diplomas, admitting students to college, or licensing for professions use a multitiered system of advisory bodies.
Read the entire page →
From page 8...
... The purpose of the technical panel is to ensure that the testing program follows sound testing practices. Its role may include reviewing and advising on the overall research and test development plan, as well as suggesting specific studies and pilot tests necessary to produce a valid, reliable, and fair test.
Read the entire page →
From page 9...
... In the late 1 990s, after members of the public questioned various aspects of the test, the state board of education created the SOL Assessment Program Advisory Committee, consisting of 23 members drawn from parent-teacher organizations, district and school officials, teachers, and the Virginia School Boards Association. The advisory committee does an annual audit of the SOL program and provides recommendations to the state board of education.
Read the entire page →
From page 10...
... For that reason, the committee's analysis and recommendations must remain separate from the operational activities of the naturalization test redesign. Although we can provide feedback related to some major aspects of the testing program, as we are doing m this report, we cannot provide the political legitimacy of a properly constituted oversight committee, the on-call and confidential advice of a properly constituted technical panel, or the broad and deep guidance of properly constituted content panels.
Read the entire page →
From page 11...
... USCIS should form an English language content panel consisting of experts m language assessment, English as a second language, and adult education. The panel should guide the development of the content framework and test specifications for the English language test, and review test items and forms to ensure they are aligned with the content framework and test specifications.
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • oversight committee
  • content framework
  • test specifications
  • testing programs
  • content panels

  • test development
  • test redesign
  • pilot tests
  • test items
  • properly constituted

  • content panel
  • advisory bodies
  • technical panel
  • technical panels
  • content frameworks

  • review test
  • development plan
  • testing contractor
  • panel consisting
  • school exit

  • panels consist
  • testing program
  • naturalization test
  • english language
  • state board

  • overall assessment
  • redesign process
  • providing scientifically
  • virginia school
  • policy directions


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.