Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix D Tools to Assess Spinal Cord Injury Outcomes
Pages 260-267

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 260...
... Tools to Assess Spinal Cord Injury Outcomes Animal Functional recovery Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) scale, an open-field locomotor test for rats · Is based on 5-point Tarlov scale · Analyzes hind-limb movements of a rat in an open field · Is a 21-point scale used to assess locomotor coordination · Rates parameters such as joint movements, the ability for weight support, limb coordination, foot placement, and gait stability · Small changes in tissue correlate to large changes on the scale · Assesses walking, not other movements requiring coordinated spinal cord activity · Does not assess pain, bowel, bladder, or sexual function Basso Mouse Scale (BMS)
From page 261...
... ; uses MEPs and SSEP (see below) · Looks at action potentials in muscle and nerves · Hard to assess minor but significant changes in locomotion · Does not assess pain, bowel, bladder, or sexual function Durham scale · Includes Tarlov scale, as well as functional task, bowel hygiene, and neck position · Is better than Tarlov scale at predicting spinal cord disorders · Hard to assess minor but significant changes in locomotion · Better suited for assessment of incomplete injuries · Does not assess pain, bowel, bladder, or sexual function Neuronal activity assessment by electrophysiology · Assesses MEPs or SSEP · Stimulates corresponding cortical areas of the brain and records response in target nerves to see if connections are still functional · Correlates to impairment of locomotor activity · Is noninvasive · Neuronal activity may not correlate with functional changes · Hard to assess subtle but critical improvements to circuitry · Does not directly assess pain, bowel, bladder, or sexual function Directed forepaw reaching · Looks at coordinated limb and muscle movement · Requires rats to reach under a barrier and pick up food with forepaws · Limited scale for assessment · Does not assess pain, bowel, bladder, or sexual function Grooming response · A little water is sprinkled on the head of a rat to elicit grooming with the rat's forelimbs and measure forelimb function · Is a brain stem-mediated spontaneous reflex sensitive to the level and severity of the injury · Looks only at forelimb response · Difficult to discriminate between loss of communication with brain stem or damage to other part of the nervous system Rearing · A rat is placed in a cylinder and is scored on how often it rears and simultaneously touches the walls of the cylinder with its forelimbs · Looks only at forelimb response
From page 262...
... 262 SPINAL CORD INJURY: PROGRESS, PROMISE, AND PRIORITIES Tools to Assess Spinal Cord Injury Outcomes Walking speed · Is used to assess locomotor training techniques · Does not assess sensory modalities influenced by muscle strength · Does not assess pain, bowel, bladder, or sexual function Rotor rod · Is used to examine sensory feedback, coordination, and muscle strength required for locomotion · Is performed by placing the animal on a rotating bar and timing how long it takes for animal to lose balance · Only measures recovery of locomotion and does not assess restoration of fine motor control or other complications associated with spinal cord injury Inclined plane · Is used to examine sensory feedback, coordination, and muscle strength required for locomotion · Is performed by placing animal on a ramp of a preset incline · Only measures recovery of locomotion and does not assess restoration of fine motor control or other complications associated with spinal cord injury Footprint · Examines an animal's gait by analyzing paw position and toe drags · Only measures recovery of locomotion and does not assess restoration of fine motor control Grid walking · Tests the ability of mice and rats to walk over a wire mesh grid · Only investigates coordinated walking and not fine motor control Forepaw withdrawal · Investigates recovery of heat perception · The forepaw is placed on a heat block and the time that it takes for the animal to withdraw it is measured · Forepaw withdrawal requires motor function · Does not assess pain, bowel, bladder, or sexual function Assessment of autonomic dysreflexia · Changes in blood pressure are determined by comparing the animals baseline blood pressure and peak blood pressure during moderate cutaneous pinches to the skin rostral and caudal to the injury · Autonomic dysreflexia is also characterized in patients by sweating, flushed skin, and piloerection, which are not assessed in mouse model Morphological assessment of recovery Histology · Is used to look at the morphology of axons and assess the degree of tissue sparing, injury, and recovery
From page 263...
... to E (the least severe) · Insensitive to small but significant changes in motor and sensory functions · May not be sensitive enough to detect even several spinal levels of regeneration in thoracic injuriesa · Does not specifically address functions that affect a patient's quality of life · Does not assess pain, bowel, bladder, or sexual function Includes: · ASIA Impairment Scale o Is based on the extent of injury and muscle strength o Uses an alphabetical score from A (the most severe)
From page 264...
... · Scale measures functional limitations in walking of individuals after a spinal cord injury · Grades physical assistance and devices required for walking after paralysis of the lower extremities · Documents changes in functional capacity in respect to ambulation in a rehabilitation setting · Limited to assessment of walking Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Ambulation Inventory · Analyzes ambulation in individuals with spinal cord injuries relating to gait parameters, assistive device use, and temporal-distance measures · Limited to assessment of walking Barthel Index · Measures individual's independence in mobility · Assesses many deficits, including those after a stroke · Is designed to measure three categories of function: self-care, continence of bowel and bladder, and mobility · Functional ability can be a predictor of discharge from hospital · Floor and ceiling of scale are not sensitive enough to measure small but significant changes in function
From page 265...
... · Measures voluntary movement and basic mobility · Is designed to be able to assess reemergence of voluntary movement and basic mobility · Assesses 30 mobility items, including upper and lower extremity mobility, using a 3- or 4-point scale · Can be used as a predictor of discharge from hospital Timed "up and go" (TUG) · Is considered the best test of functional mobility · The individual sits in a chair and is then required to stand and walk forward 3 meters · Requires patient to be able to walk Box and Block test · Is used to measure unilateral gross manual dexterity · The individual moves blocks, one by one, from one compartment to another in 60 seconds · Requires significant muscle strength and control Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)
From page 266...
... · Was designed by the World Health Organization to classify the consequences of disease and their implications on the patient's life · Defines impairment, disabilities, and handicaps · ICIDH-2 incorporates disability as a dynamic process and holds that environmental factors can influence the impairment Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART) · Is based on the World Health Organization model of handicap dimensions · Uses 27 questions and a 5-point scale to look at physical independence, economic self-sufficiency, social integration, mobility, and occupational functioning Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC)
From page 267...
... · Provides a measure of community integration after a traumatic brain injury · Consists of 15 items relating to home integration, social integration, and productive activities Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors (CHIEF) · Is designed to assess the environmental factors and understand which elements of the environment impede or facilitate the lives of people with disabling conditions · Respondents use a 5-point scale to quantify the barriers experienced within five domains of environmental factors (policies, physical and structural, work and school, attitudes and support, services and assistance)


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.