Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Ensuring That the United States Is at the Forefront in Critical Fields of Science and Technology
Pages 432-443

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 432...
... They have included support for R&D partnerships among companies and between industry and government, support for R&D activities in small companies, programs to support academic research in areas of interest to industry, policies to encourage commercialization of inventions made by federal laboratories and those made by academic researchers with federal support, initiatives to coordinate federal R&D in areas of interest to several agencies, and the creation of private-sector advisory committees concerned with the future international competitiveness of particular industries. Some of these programs have attracted controversy.
From page 433...
... • Have such agencies as the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, and the Internal Revenue Service consider launching industry–university collaborative research centers to benefit the services industries. • Re-examine and amend the Bayh–Dole Act to encourage collaboration among university licensing offices, thereby promoting economic development.
From page 434...
... Possible federal actions to improve and extend these programs include the following: • Bridge the funding gap between phase I and phase II awards provided by the SBIR program.6 • Increase the number of phase II SBIR awards at the expense of phase I awards.7 • Regularly assess SBIR program results and compare with the Department of Defense (DOD) Fast Track results, and assess the costs and benefits of better integrating SBIR awards in the development of "clusters" around universities and technology parks.8 • Create a National Institute of Innovation that would provide venture capital for innovative startup companies to smooth the peaks and valleys of private-sector venture-capital flows.9 A similar idea, called the Civil 2National Research Council.
From page 435...
... Appendix Table 4-39. ian Technology Corporation, was proposed by a National Academies committee some years ago.10 THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM AND OTHER CONSORTIA Partly as a response to Japan's success in benefiting from industrial consortia in such areas as steel and semiconductors, Congress passed the National Cooperative Research Act in 1984.
From page 436...
... Figure EL-1 shows how ATP funding has fluctuated over the years. ATP also supports an extensive program of evaluation and research, which has supported work at the National Academies and the National Bureau of Economic Research.12 Possible federal actions to derive advantage from government–industry partnerships and industrial consortia include the following: • Create "Innovation Acceleration" grants to stimulate high-risk research.13 These grants would be supported through a set aside of 3% of agency R&D budgets.
From page 437...
... SOURCE: Advanced Technology Program. "ATP Factsheet: 3.A.3: ATP Awards Summary Data-Funding ($ Millions)
From page 438...
... At the time when the STCs program was being considered for renewal, a National Academies committee recommended that the program continue.24 Figure EL-2 shows how the various NSF centers programs fit into the overall funding picture. Options for federal action include the following: • Establish a new, large, multi-agency centers program.
From page 439...
... FY 2005 Performance and Accountability Report. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 2005.
From page 440...
... 30National Research Council. Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles.
From page 441...
... Background paper for Re-Engineering Intellectual Property Rights Agreements in Industry-University Collaborations. Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable, National Academies, June 26, 2003.
From page 442...
... A more recent example is the Commission on the Future of the United States Aerospace Industry.36 A followup effort, the National Aerospace Initiative, has sought to involve the relevant agencies in the development of technology roadmaps for the industry.37 The President's Information Technology Advisory Committee, which was disbanded in June 2005, issued a final report recommending that federal agencies change the way they fund computational science and calling on the National Academies to lead a roadmapping effort.38 Several years ago, an advisory committee to NSF recommended the launch of an effort to boost cyberinfrastructure for research enabled by information technology.39 34A.
From page 443...
... • Commission the National Academies to convene one or more task forces to develop and maintain a multidecade roadmap for computational science and the fields that require it, with a goal of ensuring continuing US leadership in science, engineering, the social sciences, and the humanities. • Direct NSF to establish and lead a large-scale, interagency, and internationally coordinated Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Program to create, deploy, and apply cyberinfrastructure in ways that radically empower all scientific and engineering research and allied education.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.