Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

4 Communicating Forecast Uncertainty
Pages 66-97

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 66...
... This chapter addresses the committee's third task: iden- Full disclosure of forecast uncertainty information is tifying sources of misunderstanding in communicating consistent with -- and in fact fundamental to -- NWS's estabforecast uncertainty, including vulnerabilities dependent lished vision for communicating information (Box 4.1)
From page 67...
... or no useful uncertainty information; they are simplified and • Provide a "measuring stick" to decision makers to guide deterministic. Members of the public have been conditioned their evaluation of forecasts and forecast uncertainty.
From page 68...
... Finding: The public weather forecasts from the IFPS and The provision of single-valued forecasts without uncertainty information (such as error bars on a meteograph) not distributed as the NDFD are one of NWS's primary foreonly exposes a significant limitation of the NDFD/IFPS cast products.
From page 69...
... and the Climate Prediction user community and could be even more widely read and Center's (CPC's) monthly and seasonal forecasts.
From page 70...
... 70 COMPLETING THE FORECAST BOX 4.4 Communication of Forecast Information During the Red River Flood of 1997 in Grand Forks, North Dakota Unclear communication of uncertain forecast information can hinder decision making and have significant negative consequences. An example is the 1997 flood in Grand Forks, North Dakota (Figure 4.2)
From page 71...
... . The EC areas can 4.3.1.2 Climate Prediction Center Monthly and be ambiguous because they may also indicate the forecastSeasonal Outlooks ers' belief that each of the categories truly is equally likely.
From page 72...
... The Recommendation 4.3: The CPC should provide full anomaly values for precipitation are based on the difference exceedence probability distributions of the projected between the medians of the "normal" and "final forecast" monthly and seasonal temperature and precipitation distributions. Thus, anomalies indicated on the precipitation values in both graphical and tabular forms.
From page 73...
... . Incorporating this knowledge into NWS As noted in the preceding section, icons have the capaand Enterprise efforts to communicate forecast uncertainty bility to communicate complex information in an easily
From page 74...
... 74 COMPLETING THE FORECAST FIGURE 4.7 Example anomaly distribution for a 3-month temperature prediction for southwest Arizona.
From page 75...
... 75 COMMUNICATING FORECAST UNCERTAINTY FIGURE 4.8 Example of potentially confusing icons and accompanying text.
From page 76...
... aging the local forecast offices that balances a respect for Dissemination technologies are evolving rapidly, affectlocal innovation and creativity with greater control over the ing how NWS and the other members of the Enterprise activities that affect the public-private partnership, especially approach communicating uncertainty information. Comthose that concern the development and dissemination of new munication devices such as cell phones, personal digital products or services." assistants (PDAs)
From page 77...
... 77 COMMUNICATING FORECAST UNCERTAINTY BOX 4.6 Consistency in Communicating Forecast Uncertainty Using Words and Graphics Four forecast products containing uncertainty words or graphics are used in this example: the text forecast (Figure 4.11) for March 5 to 11 (Sunday to Saturday)
From page 78...
... 78 COMPLETING THE FORECAST BOX 4.6 Continued FIGURE 4.12 Hourly weather graph for Sunday, March 5 to Tuesday, March 7.
From page 79...
... 79 COMMUNICATING FORECAST UNCERTAINTY BOX 4.6 Continued FIGURE 4.13 Hourly weather graph for Friday, March 10 to Saturday, March 11.
From page 80...
... 80 COMPLETING THE FORECAST BOX 4.6 Continued FIGURE 4.14 Digital IFPS forecast product for Sunday, March 5 to Wednesday, March 8.
From page 81...
... 81 COMMUNICATING FORECAST UNCERTAINTY BOX 4.6 Continued FIGURE 4.15 Probability of snow accumulation. SOURCE: NWS Hydrometeorological Prediction Center.
From page 82...
... 82 COMPLETING THE FORECAST BOX 4.6 Continued FIGURE 4.16 Regional synopsis for northern Illinois and northwest Indiana, Sunday, March 5.
From page 83...
... As such, intermediaries, and specifically the media, majority of -- forecast uncertainty information is provided play a critical role in communicating forecast uncertainty to users through "new" media, NWS and the Enterprise will and addressing the challenges presented in doing this effecstill need to serve users who receive their forecasts through tively. To fully understand the implications of this situation, long-standing "traditional" media including television, news it is helpful to understand the business fundamentals of the papers, and radio.
From page 84...
... In addition, SAB may to communicating forecasts represents such a fundamental not be the appropriate venue for dealing with the details and change in the presentation of information that user percep- nuances of forecast uncertainty information and how it is tions and opinions will be needed throughout the product presented and disseminated. development process.
From page 85...
... constant evolution of technology and user needs, as well as the user population itself. 4.5 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION OF FORECAST UNCERTAINTY 9Information provided to the committee by NOAA describes recent efforts by the NWS Hydrologic Services Division to engage users, commu- Without a stronger knowledge base, NWS and broader nicators, and outside expertise at the initial stage of product development.
From page 86...
... the needs of users for users in key aspects of uncertainty communication. In all, uncertainty information and incorporating these needs into because of the complex, interdisciplinary nature of the topic, communication techniques; (2)
From page 87...
... Second, effective comuncertainty information. With respect to the training compo- munication requires considering and preventing potential nent, academia and government laboratories could partner on user misunderstanding and confusion that can result from developing coursework that addresses forecast uncertainty.
From page 88...
... One way of using maps include developing comprehensive education and training to communicate forecast uncertainty is to portray the spatial efforts and a dedicated, long-term research and development distribution of the likelihood of an event (e.g., tornado) or of program to improve uncertainty communication in hydro- a parameter exceeding a specified threshold (e.g., precipitameteorological forecasts.
From page 89...
... 89 COMMUNICATING FORECAST UNCERTAINTY a b 4A-1a fixed im.
From page 90...
... 90 COMPLETING THE FORECAST FIGURE 4A.2 Upper bound (90 percent exceedance) and lower bound (10 percent exceedance)
From page 91...
... in hydrometeorological forecasts are two-dimensional. HowOne type of forecast uncertainty graph depicts the temporal ever, three-dimensional representations can also be used (see, evolution of a quantity of interest, with uncertainty repre- e.g., the NRC's Board on Mathematical Sciences and their sented using an ensemble of multiple temporal trajectories, applications workshop "Toward Improved Visualization of box and whisker plots at each time, or probabilities of Uncertain Information")
From page 92...
... , overlaid with NCEP ensemble spread (filled contours)
From page 93...
... Nevertheless, as discussed in Chapter 1, forecast uncertainty. This uncertainty information is not most forecasts received by the public and many users still integrated into the QPF product, however, and thus is likely contain little or no information about uncertainty.
From page 94...
... 94 COMPLETING THE FORECAST FIGURE 4A.7 Wind and temperature forecast for days 1-10, including forecast uncertainty. For box-and-whisker plots, the top and bottom of the box represent the 75th and 25th percentile, respectively, while the top and bottom of the lines represent the maximum and minimum.
From page 95...
... 95 COMMUNICATING FORECAST UNCERTAINTY FIGURE 4A.9 PDF for the temperature forecast for a specific time and location, summarized into a table of categorical exceedances on right-hand side. SOURCE: UK Meteorological Office.
From page 96...
... 4A-11 fixed i. FIGURE 4A.12 Public weather forecast generated by IFPS from NDFD.
From page 97...
... 97 COMMUNICATING FORECAST UNCERTAINTY FIGURE 4A.13 Day 2 quantitative precipitation forecast. SOURCE: Operational NWS product, generated by HPC.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.