Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

2 Exposures in the Persian Gulf
Pages 21-44

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 21...
... EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES As described in more detail in later chapters, most of the Gulf War literature is based on veterans' reports of their own exposures. In addition, many studies report the prevalence of specific health outcomes or clusters of outcomes among Gulf War veterans; those studies might or might not compare prevalence with that of control groups.
From page 22...
... list of 7,691 people who were vaccinated at least once. The list was compiled from several sources and is the largest compilation of Gulf War veterans identified as receiving anthrax vaccination.
From page 23...
... (2004a) specifically asked Australian Gulf War veterans to refer to their own immunization booklets for information regarding the number and timing of immunizations relative to their Gulf War deployment.
From page 24...
... Exposure to Depleted Uranium The validity of self-reported exposure to DU can be evaluated on the basis of measurement of urinary uranium. Uranium activity decreases over time, but it has a very long radiologic half-life (4.5 x109 years for U-238)
From page 25...
... Those studies clearly indicate that a high frequency of Gulf War veterans report a large number of exposures but provide little information regarding the validity or magnitude of the exposures. Studies that compared self-reported exposure frequencies with exposure of control groups are more informative.
From page 26...
... Given that the simulation studies demonstrate the potential for high exposures to combustion products (some of which are similar to those in the oil-fire smoke plume) , exposures to tent-heater emissions could modify or potentially confound the assessment of associations between oil-well fire smoke exposure and respiratory outcomes.
From page 27...
... , and Bernard Rostker, of DOD, used models to estimate ground-level concentrations of sarin and cyclosarin as a function of distance and direction from the detonation sites and then to estimate the extent of potential exposure of US military personnel to the nerve agents (PAC 1996a)
From page 28...
... Table 2.1 and the chronology that follows describe the evolution of those approaches to estimate potential exposures. It must be noted, however, that in no cases were sarin and cyclosarin measured, although a Czechoslovak chemical-decontamination unit did detect sarin in areas of northern Saudi Arabia within the timeframe of the Khamisiyah demolition, which suggested that sarin was released into the air.
From page 29...
... Revision included updated meteorologic and dispersion models incorporating dilution, deposition, and degradation terms; revised emissions estimates from the CIA, and improved troop location information and specificity (Model 1 determined
From page 30...
... . · DOD's estimate of the troop number possibly exposed increased by about 2,000.
From page 31...
... EXPOSURES IN THE PERSIAN GULF 31 Day 1 ­ 1997 Model SOURCE: Rostker 2000. Day 1 ­ 2000 Model SOURCE: Rostker 2000.
From page 32...
... 32 GULF WAR AND HEALTH Day 2 ­ 1997 Model SOURCE: Rostker 2000. Day 2 ­ 2000 Model SOURCE: Rostker 2000.
From page 33...
... EXPOSURES IN THE PERSIAN GULF 33 Day 3 ­ 1997 Model SOURCE: Rostker 2000. Day 3 ­ 2000 Model SOURCE: Rostker 2000.
From page 34...
... 34 GULF WAR AND HEALTH Day 4 ­ 1997 Model SOURCE: Rostker 2000. Day 4 ­ 2000 Model SOURCE: Rostker 2000.
From page 35...
... Most important, the revised model included more-specific information regarding the location of individual military units at the time of the Khamisiyah explosion and added information on Air Force personnel that was not included in the original estimates. In the earlier (1997)
From page 36...
... Even if the final model can be accepted as an accurate determination of exposure, an important problem for epidemiologic studies has been introduced by the numerous notifications to veterans regarding potential exposure to agents released from Khamisiyah. Given that the sequential notifications went to different people, under any of the more recent modeling scenarios there will be people who were previously notified as being exposed but who will be considered unexposed on the basis of model results.
From page 37...
... Most of the oil fires were still burning when measurements began. Individual fires created distinct smoke plumes over short distances, but over longer distances the plumes merged into one "supercomposite" plume about 40 km wide south of Kuwait City.
From page 38...
... . The reference category of no exposure accounted for 16.8% of the 405,142 study subjects (75% of the active-duty deployed Gulf War veterans)
From page 39...
... (2004b) reported the results of urinary uranium measurements for a total of 446 Gulf War veterans, including 169 veterans with no known friendly-fire involvement but self-reporting of other potential DU exposures.
From page 40...
... . In summary, results of detailed surveillance indicate persistently increased urinary uranium in a very small number of subjects with embedded DU-containing shrapnel.
From page 41...
... 2005. Mortality in US Army Gulf War Veterans Exposed to 1991 Khamisiyah Chemical Munitions Destruction.
From page 42...
... 1999b. The postwar hospitalization experience of Gulf War Veterans possibly exposed to chemical munitions destruction at Khamisiyah, Iraq.
From page 43...
... 2001b. Surveillance of depleted uranium exposed Gulf War veterans: Health effects observed in an enlarged "friendly fire" cohort.
From page 44...
... 1998. Health status of Persian Gulf War veterans: Self-reported symptoms, environmental exposures and the effect of stress.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.