Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

2 Tracking and Benchmarking Progress
Pages 45-60

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 45...
... Other countries with excellent science and technology (S&T) infrastructure and wellcoordinated nanotechnology initiatives are also expected to have similar or perhaps better programs in select fields.
From page 46...
... public spending on nanotechnology R&D with funding with that of other governments because of differences in calculating and budgeting expen ditures. For example, how various governments define nanotechnology, invest through combinations of public and private funding, calculate indirect costs, and report R&D cost factors,including researchers'salaries,can differ from U.S.practice in connection with the NNI.
From page 47...
... tr A c k i N g A N dB e N c h M A r k i N gPr o g r e S S of new initiatives have been reported from various individual countries.7 PCAST has commissioned the Science and Technology Policy Institute, a federally funded research and development center, to conduct a study to assess U.S. government funding as it compares to that of foreign governments.8 So that the current status of U.S.
From page 48...
... Data were not available to it that would allow the committee to comment on possible directions in venture capital funding in other countries. Infrastructure In addition to funding type and amount,R&D infrastructure,human resources, industry infrastructure, and industry readiness also represent important invest ments in nanotechnology development.
From page 49...
... 49 yrtsudnI ssenidaeR riaF riaF riaF riaF riaF dooG riaF riaF riaF dooG riaF riaF tnellecxE tnellecxE tnellecxE htiwderapmoCD&RygolonhcetonaNfotnemssessAerutcurtsarfnIdnagnidnuFnoigeRcfiicaPaisA yrtsudnI erutcurtsarfnI riaF riaF dooG riaF riaF dooG riaF riaF dooG dooG riaF riaF tnellecxE tnellecxE tnellecxE namuH ecruoseR dooG dooG dooG gniniarT dooG dooG gniniarT dooG dooG dooG gniniarT gniniarT dooG tnellecxE tnellecxE D&R erutcurtsarfnI dooG dooG dooG ssergorpnI ssergorpnI tnellecxE ssergorpnI dooG dooG dooG ssergorpnI ssergorpnI tnellecxE tnellecxE tnellecxE rePgnidnuF atipaC 365.1 740.0 334.1 500.0 190.0 861.4 151.0 057.2 535.2 699.3 670.0 210.0 833.7 442.3 849.3 1-2ELBAT erutcurtsarfnIdnagnidnuFUEdna.S.U 4002gnidnuF ) noillim$S.U( 03 06 01 5 02 802 4 11 9 1.19 5 1 049 169 618,1 noitalupoP )
From page 50...
... 50 fossenerawA eraChtlaeH hgiH muideM muideM muideM muideM hgiH hgiH muideM muideM hgiH hgiH muideM muideM fossenerawA latnemnorivnE tcapmI muideM muideM muideM muideM muideM hgiH hgiH muideM muideM muideM hgiH muideM muideM ssenerawA ygrenEfo tcapmI muideM muideM muideM muideM muideM hgiH hgiH riaF riaF riaF dooG riaF riaF srotcaFyteicoSdnaygolonhcetonaNfotnemssessAnoigeRcfiicaPaisA cilbuP nrecnoC ksiRtuobA muideM muideM dooG riaF riaF muideM muideM riaF riaF dooG dooG riaF riaF cilbuP ssenerawA stifeneBfo muideM muideM muideM muideM muideM hgiH hgiH muideM muideM hgiH hgiH hgiH muideM noitacudE margorP hgiH muideM woL woL woL hgiH hgiH woL muideM hgiH hgiH muideM hgiH yrtsudnI tcapmI muideM woL muideM woL woL hgiH hgiH woL woL muideM muideM woL woL tnemnrevoG yciloP troppuS muideM hgiH hgiH muideM woL hgiH hgiH muideM muideM hgiH hgiH hgiH hgiH tnemnrevoG yciloP ssenerawA muideM hgiH hgiH hgiH woL hgiH hgiH muideM muideM hgiH hgiH hgiH hgiH 2-2ELBAT ymonocE ailartsuA anihC gnoKgnoH aidnI aisenodnI napaJ aeroK aisyalaM dnalaeZ weN eropagniS nawiaT dnaliahT manteiV ygolonhcetonaNlabolGapoleveDotpohskroWlanoitanretnIdr3ehtotnoitatneserp",noigeRcfiicaPaisAehtniygolonhcetonaN",uiL.LdnaakanaT.K:ECRUOS .5002tsuguAdessecca,fdp.akanaT/sklat_raas/nekcurbraas/55.022.501.921//:ptthtaelbaliavA.ynamreG,nekcürbraaS,5002,72-62yaM,krowteN
From page 51...
... tr A c k i N g A N d B e N c h M A r k i N gP r o g r e S S TABLE 2-3 Nanotechnology Funding and Projects in Asia Assessment Criterion Japan China Korea Taiwan Singapore India R&D infrastructure 10 5 8 7 6 3 Industry base 10 5 8 8 6 3 Manpower 9 9 7 6 4 7 Nano materials 9 8 7 6 5 5 Nano device 9 5 8 7 5 3 Nanobio 9 4 5 5 6 3 Nano characterization 9 5 7 6 6 4 Overall assessment 9 6 7 6 5 4 SOURCE: The Asian Technology Information Program (ATIP)
From page 52...
... Updated from a similar figure that appeared in President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, 2005, The National Nano technology Initiative at Five Years: Assessment and Recommendations of the National Nanotechnology 2-3 Advisory Panel, May.
From page 53...
... Updated from a similar figure that appeared in President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, 2005, The National Nanotechnology Initiative at Five Years: Assessment and Recom 2-5 mendations of the National Nanotechnology Advisory Panel, May.
From page 54...
... A M A t t e r o fSi z e Patents The number of patents applied for and granted is another indicator of a nation's standing and accomplishments with respect to R&D and business inno vation. Yet, although patents relating to nanotechnology are currently tracked by the U.S.
From page 55...
... Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2Fsearch -adv.htm&r=0&p=1&f=S&l=50&Query=ccl%2F977%2F%24%0D%0A&d=ptxt, accessed March 2006. 3See http://www.uspto.gov/go/classification/uspc977/defs977.pdf, accessed March 2006.
From page 56...
... A M A t t e r o f S i z e United States; focusing on the development and sale of materials with features at a scale of 1 to 100 nanometers; developing these products as part of an integrated system; and demonstrating advantages inherent to these products or materials because of their small size. A broader analysis performed in the United Kingdom17 of nanotechnology related patents awarded from 1990 to 2004 (Figure 2-6)
From page 57...
... tr A c k i N g A N dBe N c h M A r k i N gPr o g r e S S Drawing on USPTO Patent Class 977-related data in the Thomson Aureka and Delphion search engines and databases, a 2005 study from U.S.-based Intellectual Assets Inc. indicated that nanotechnology was a growing field worldwide over the period from January 1, 1975, to August 15, 2005, and also noted a significant increase in the early 2000s in U.S.
From page 58...
... A M A t t e r o fS i z e Nanosciences Technology transfer 500 450 stnednopseRforebmuN 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Technology Transfer Europe North America Japan China Nanosciences Don't Know Region FIGURE 2-7 Regions perceived to be leading in nanoscience and the transfer of nanotechnology to industry, 2004.
From page 59...
... 8. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.2005.The National Nanotechnology Initiative at Five Years: Assessment and Recommendations of the National Nanotechnology Advisory Panel.
From page 60...
... 0 A M A t t e r o f Si z e 20. International Union of Materials Research Societies.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.