Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

3 Economic Impact
Pages 61-72

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 61...
... Recognizing the promise of research at the nanoscale as a driver of similarly revolutionary technology advances, the government mandate to fund basic research under the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) involves an expectation for significant outcomes -- that a federal investment in NNI-related R&D programs will lead to results that increase the U.S.
From page 62...
... Examples include syn thetic zeolites, high-strength metallic alloys, and microchips with feature sizes of less than 100 nanometers. Emerging nanotechnologies were defined as resulting from innovations using nanomaterials and nanointermediates, such as quantum dots, fullerenes, and nano-delivered drugs.
From page 63...
... The committee notes, however, that nanotechnology, like virtually all other disruptive or enabling technologies, will lead to the destruction as well as the creation of jobs. The Lux report noted that as emerging nanotechnologies develop and come to market, improved nanotechnology products will also drive second- and thirdorder disruptions across industries.
From page 64...
... A M A t t e r o fSi z e nanoparticles and bulk materials such as nanostructured metals, polymers, and ceramics. The second generation of products, which appeared starting in about 2005, includes active nanostructures such as transistors, amplifiers, targeted drugs and chemicals, actuators, and adaptive structures; the key focus of research for this generation of products is novel devices and device system architectures.
From page 65...
... ec o N o M i c iM P A c t core set of technology transfer indicators, such as cooperative research and development agreements, invention disclosures, patent applications and awards, and licensing agreements. The Department of Commerce (DOC)
From page 66...
... A M A t t e r o fSi z e Broader Efforts Toward Technology Transfer From a broader perspective the committee notes that the federal government has played a role in assisting companies, in particular small start-ups, to cross the significant gap between technology development and product commercialization, the so called"valley of death."The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR)
From page 67...
... In addition to federal­state partnerships, industry­state partnerships are essential to launching nanotechnology initiatives at the state level, as indicated at the 2003 NNI Workshop on Regional and State Programs.16 State investments in nanotechnology include state­corporate partnerships, state­university partnerships, and partnerships with consortiums of corporations. It is worth noting, however, that on occasion disputes over intellectual property ownership have been a barrier to the successful implementation of these kinds of partnerships.
From page 68...
... A M A t t e r o fSi z e FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATION Measuring Economic Impact Evaluating the economic impacts of investments in nanotechnology R&D in a rigorous fashion will require a set of metrics and an aggregation of high quality, uniform data on technology transfer and commercialization. Measures of intellectual property acquired and collaborative R&D partnerships established can also be useful to help gauge technology transfer activities in nanotechnology.
From page 69...
... Moreover, any future analysis of economic impact will be hindered unless data are collected and metrics developed that will facilitate a rigorous analysis of economic indicators such as jobs created or individuals employed as a result of nanotechnology development. As both an enabling and a disruptive technology, nanotechnology will have effects that extend beyond one specific industry or market sector and will also be pervasive in multiple applications, a circumstance that will present additional challenges to rigorous assessment of the technology's economic impact.
From page 70...
... 0 A M A t t e r o fSi z e The committee concluded that currently available data are insufficient to permit a quantitative analysis of the economic impact of nanotechnology. In addi tion, those public and private forecasts of the impact of nanotechnology that are available lack consistency.
From page 71...
... 2004. Nanoscale science and engineering: Unifying and transforming tools.
From page 72...
... 16. Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology Subcommittee, Committee on Technology, National Science and Technology Council (NSTC)


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.