Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix C: Measures Used in the Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Pages 169-184

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 169...
... Appendix C Measures Used in the Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Table begins on next page.
From page 170...
... and continuous assessment • Five-point Likert ratings of symptom severity (0–4) • Time frames for assessment include: past week, month, or worst month since trauma • Initially validated on combat veterans, subsequently applied in a wide variety of trauma populations including victims of rape, crime, motor vehicle accidents, incest, torture, and cancer (Weathers et al., 2001)
From page 171...
... • F1/I2 most lenient in clinical sample, second in research, clinician rating-based rules most stringent (Weathers et al., 1999) • Explicit reporting and use of several scoring rules recommended • Lenient rules recommended for screening purposes, while stringent rules appropriate for confirming diagnosis or creating case groups (Weathers et al., 1999)
From page 172...
... • Semistructured interview • 15-minute administration by trained lay interviewer • Dichotomous (yes/no) symptom ratings • Does not assess symptom severity, can be used for diagnosis • Requires patient to associate each symptom with a specific traumatic event Davidson Trauma • Assesses DSM-IV PTSD criteria (B–D)
From page 173...
... Sensitivity: community .22; clinical .81–.89, .23–.89 Specificity: community .98, clinical .92–.94, .92–.98 (Kulka et al., 1991) Diagnostic accuracy: 83% • Frequency: 0–68 Internal consistency (alpha)
From page 174...
... Likert rating scales Los Angeles • Assesses for PTSD symptoms and • 17-item PTSD index Symptom Checklist associated features including signs of (LASC) (King et al., distress and functional problems 1995)
From page 175...
... • Total: 35–175 Specificity: .83–.89 (Newman et al., 1996) • Diagnostic cutoff score: 107 (Keane et Diagnostic Accuracy: .9 (Keane et al., 1988)
From page 176...
... checklist of traumatic events • 4-point Likert rating for frequency of PTSD symptoms in the past month and self-ratings of impairment across nine areas of functioning • Validated across several populations, including combat veterans and sexual and nonsexual-assault survivors (Keane et al., 2000) PTSD Checklist • Assesses DSM PTSD diagnostic criteria • Principal components (PCL)
From page 177...
... (Blanchard et al., 1996; Weathers et al., 1993) • Reductions in diagnostic accuracy as symptoms improve and approach threshold for diagnostic criteria (Forbes et al., 2001)
From page 178...
... S) : 10 minute administration • Likert rating scales for criterion symptoms • Dichotomous and continuous assessment • 2-week time frame Symptom • Assesses a broad range of • 9 primary symptom Checklist‑90‑R psychological problems, symptoms of dimensions, 3 global (SCL-90-R)
From page 179...
... • War-Zone-Related PTSD Scale is only SCL-90 PTSD scale that has greater predictive validity than the Global Severity Index (Green, 1991) Sensitivity: .81 Specificity: .98 Kappa: .68 (Keane et al., 1998)
From page 180...
... for the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder in motor vehicle accident victims. Behaviour Research and Therapy 33:471-475.
From page 181...
... 1997. The validation of a self-report mea sure of posttraumatic stress disorder: The posttraumatic diagnostic scale.
From page 182...
... 1998. Confirmatory factor analysis of the c ­ linician-administered PTSD scale: Evidence for the dimensionality of posttraumatic stress disorder.
From page 183...
... 1999. Psychometric properties of nine scor ing rules for the clinician-administered post-traumatic stress disorder scale.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.