Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix D: Results of a Survey of International Collaborative Research in Psychology: Views and Recommendations from Twenty-six Leaders of Projects
Pages 64-78

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 64...
... National Committee for the International Union of Psychological Science Survey Consultant (2005-2006) Workshop on International Collaborations in Social and Behavioral Sciences Research October 5-6, 2006 Northwestern University Norris University Center Evanston, Illinois 64
From page 65...
... SUMMARY OF RESPONSES TO PART A OF THE SURVEY Clusters Representing Five Types of Projects These projects have been classified into five clusters according to information provided in the topic/title and purpose sections of the survey (see Table D1)
From page 66...
... , a 13-country study of adolescents from immigrant and national (nonimmigrant) backgrounds CLUSTER 1 D The Effects of Improving Care Giving on Early Development, a project that studied training and training plus structural changes in orphanages in St.
From page 67...
... Cross-national collaboration on an intervention project to enhance critical thinking skills 3. Research project on sex roles and sex stereotypes performance in Turkey 4.
From page 68...
... Roles of Vividness of Landmarks and Paths in Learning Routes CLUSTER 4 T TEDDY -- The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young CLUSTER 3 U A Microgenetic/Cross-Sectional Study of Matrix Completion CLUSTER 4 V The IEA's TIMSS Video Studies -- 1993 to 2003 CLUSTER 4 W Long-Term Effects of Urbanization and Poverty on Health and Development in Johannesburg CLUSTER 5 X 1. Representing and Learning from Classroom Processes -- Comparing Elementary Mathematics Instruction in China and the U.S.
From page 69...
... Value Added by International Research (Theme 1) Clusters did differ in the specific expected "value added" from international collaboration (asked under Theme 1 of Part B of the survey)
From page 70...
... . Cluster 3 projects engaged in international collaboration largely to take advantage of skills or techniques available at specific universities or labs abroad or to find instances of a medical condition that is relatively rare.
From page 71...
... The overwhelming impression is that personal relationships (often but not always facilitated by international congresses or formal exchange programs such as Fulbrights) were important in initiating and sustaining projects.
From page 72...
... 1 Bulgaria 3 Canada 5 Chile 1 China 2 Colombia 1 Cyprus (Greek) 1 Czech Republic 4 Denmark 3 Estonia 1 Finland 5 France 4 Germany 7 Greece 2 Guatemala 1 Hong Kong 3 Hungary 3 India 1 Israel 4 Italy 2 Japan 2 Latvia 1 Lithuania 1 Mexico 2 Netherlands 3 New Zealand 1 Norway 3 Poland 2 Portugal 2 Romania 2 Russia 5 Slovakia 2 Slovenia 2 South Africa 2 Sweden 5 Switzerland 2 Spain 1 Turkey 1 UK (or England)
From page 73...
... . Several respondents spoke of initial mistrust among participants, which required conscious efforts at consensus building (in addition to the contentoriented communication required to code data and prepare publications)
From page 74...
... The projects involved researchers whose primary identifications were psychology, sociology, education, measurement/statistics, criminology, medicine, physiology, philosophy, communications, and ethnography. Some projects dealt with this by explicitly using a mixed method design, others by negotiating about what could be learned by using different methods or taking different perspectives on a issue.
From page 75...
... The open-ended questions asked about the funding infrastructure and its management, research regulation (including institutional review boards, or IRBs) , incentives, bureaucracies, visas, and communication (face-to-face and electronic)
From page 76...
... Quite a number of projects did not appear to have dedicated Web pages used for dissemination of results (as they did not provide Web addresses)
From page 77...
... • Establish a U.S. fund for supporting international collaborations, especially involving younger scholars and those from countries where capacity building is especially urgent (perhaps in collaboration with professional organizations)
From page 78...
... • Develop models for disseminating the results of internationally collaborative projects (executive summaries, policy briefs for different audiences including those in participating countries, Web pages)


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.