Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix F: June 14, 2005: A Case Study in Tsunami Warning and Response
Pages 243-248

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 243...
... Officials in southern California were faced with the potential of a locally damaging tsunami striking San Diego county that would not impact Tijuana, Baja California, a few miles to the south. By 8:19 PM, after further analysis, the Gorda earthquake was judged as not likely to be tsunamigenic (the earthquake magnitude was refined to measure M7.2 and was located in the middle of the Gorda Plate, not on the Cascadia subduction zone (CSZ)
From page 244...
... , a teletype service connecting local law enforcement agencies to the California Department of Justice. At the same time that official notification to the CSWC and local governments was occurring, the WC/ATWC notification was being automatically transmitted over the Weather Wire to subscribers of email and pager notification services, over the Emergency Managers Weather Information Notification (EMWIN)
From page 245...
... Given the short time span in Humboldt and Del Norte counties between earthquake shaking, issuance of the tsunami warning by the WC/ATWC, and possible tsunami wave arrival, this demand made it difficult for the CSWC and OES to expedite the warning process, a problem that was exacerbated by overloaded wire and cell telephone systems, inadequate staffing at the state and local government emergency operations centers, and limited training at the local government level. Despite the confusion that was prompted by the conflicting message sent by the Pacific Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System (PTWS)
From page 246...
... At 8:40, an official State EMD Public Information Officer spoke to several radio and television stations regarding the evacuation suggestions, reminding citizens and officials that the warning of evacuation was only set in place for those living "on the beach" or in "low lying areas." Approximately 20 minutes later, the State EOC received the tsunami cancellation message, which it transmitted to the public via NAWAS 5 minutes later. Fortunately, no major tsunami occurred and the events of June 14 served as a "stress test" for the notification system technology, the training of warning personnel, and the response of the public to a potential tsunami.
From page 247...
... • An earthquake will severely disrupt telecommunications and challenge even redun dant systems to perform their dissemination responsibilities.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.