Crisis Standards of Care Summary of a Workshop Series (2010) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix D: Participant Feedback Survey Responses
Appendix D: Participant Feedback Survey Responses
Pages 105-124
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 105... ...
Count Percentage Healthcare provider 24 45% Emergency medical services 10 19% Emergency management 9 17% Hospital administration 9 17% First responder 6 11% Local health official 5 9% State health official 5 9% Professional association 4 8% Private sector 3 6% 105
|
From page 106... ...
1 2% National Library of Medicine project; hospital medical library 1 2% University professor 1 2% World network private sector/first responder 1 2% NOTE: Percentages add to greater than 100 because some participants checked multiple groups.
|
From page 107... ...
45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% I have done a I have done I plan to begin I have thought I had not significant some work on work on this about this topic thought about amount of work this topic topic in the but do not this topic very on this topic near future foresee taking much specific actions in the near future
|
From page 108... ...
50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Extremely useful Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful (Optional) Comments • A lot of useful information was brought up at the workshop, but it seemed as though attendance beyond people who sat on panels was quite limited.
|
From page 109... ...
Developing the ethic platform for a state standard. Implementing altered standards of care through
|
From page 110... ...
I un derstand the role the state health department plays; however, I feel that the LPHA has much more experience working with and within the local community than the state does. Total responses to this question: 18 Prior knowledge: Somewhat or not very familiar with issues • The diversity of issues and approaches.
|
From page 111... ...
Much of the info gathered from this conference will be included on hospital disaster preparedness webpage. • Will adapt those to our Medical Reserve Corps component in Marion County, FL.
|
From page 112... ...
Ap peals, triage officer. • To begin discussion and development of policies to address these issues and to lobby the state Department of Public Health to do the same.
|
From page 113... ...
• To help initiate additional communication in the planning proc ess for emergencies. • I plan to start dialogue with our municipal fire department on is sues heard at the workshop and attempt to [have a]
|
From page 114... ...
50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Extremely useful Very useful Somew hat useful Not very useful (Optional) Comments • Really are no "practical solutions" yet, really new untalked-about topic.
|
From page 115... ...
Total responses to this question: 10 10. If applicable, please describe any practical solutions the workshop helped you to identify, and briefly describe the next actions you will take.
|
From page 116... ...
• Developing our philosophical statement, including the ethical platform. Ideas for implementing altered standards of care via governor's Executive Order at the time of crisis and implement ing via the state EOC versus working through the state legisla ture to pass language.
|
From page 117... ...
I was most disap pointed that FL Board of Medicine and Nursing, Agency for Health Care Administration, and Emergency Management were not active participants. Lines of authority among these agencies once an emergency has been declared need to be established, espe cially among public and private healthcare providers who may have to resort to some form of altered standards of care.
|
From page 118... ...
• I was pleased to be able to meet others who are working in this area, and anticipate that now knowing them will be of great value to us in our anticipated project on legal issues involving altered standards of care. • I made contact with some stakeholders, and hopefully plans for networking will materialize.
|
From page 119... ...
• I will maintain ongoing communication during mass casualty events. • Ability to know who individuals are, more than presentation con tent, which was quite rushed.
|
From page 120... ...
• Bring the Trial Lawyers of America on board. • I would like to have the opportunity to work with some of those who presented in the workshop when we begin our project on legal issues related to altered standards of care.
|
From page 121... ...
• Future workshops should utilize speakers who are focused on the issues, not focused on their personal accomplishments or showing off their vocabulary. • Have the next event posted on listservs for American College of Physicians, American College of Emergency Physicians, and other professions.
|
From page 122... ...
[They] give time for surge to develop and to discuss altered standards that most disasters do not, as most dis asters occur immediately with immediate overwhelming of re sources with no warning -- there is no progression from conventional to contingency to crisis over days to weeks in most disasters -- it is conventional to crisis in 15 minutes.
|
From page 123... ...
The workshops offered a method of outreach to regional, state, and local participants and I would encourage you to cultivate those contacts. • It would have been helpful to better understand the IOM's even tual overall goals with defining standards of care in a mass casu alty event.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.