Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

3 Leveraging Existing Standards to Improve K–12 Engineering Education
Pages 23-36

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 23...
... Existing national and state standards documents present logical opportunities to infuse engineering learning goals. Thus they provide a basis for including engineering in curricula, instruction, assessment, and professional development, which will help establish engineering as a legitimate subject in K–12 education.
From page 24...
... Engineering learning goals could also be inserted elsewhere in Benchmarks -- particularly in the chapter on the designed world. The NRC has initiated a new project to develop a framework for the next generation of K–12 science education standards (Robelen, 2010)
From page 25...
... However, one goal of the com mon core effort is to restrict the number of student learning goals, which could limit how much engineering content can be added. Even if common core science education standards are not forthcoming, the NRC framework for a new generation of science education standards is expected to include engineering content.
From page 26...
... However, the recently released common core state standards for mathematics do not even contain the word engineer or engineering (CCSSO and NGA, 2010)
From page 27...
... Although both sets of national science education standards and the technological literacy standards are infused to varying degrees with engineering concepts -- and more infusion is possible -- the question is to what extent these concepts appear -- or might appear in the future -- at the state level. The possible emergence of common core science standards raises new possibilities, as well as constraints, for the inclusion of engineering learning goals.
From page 28...
... In June 2009, the New Jersey Board of Education elected to add engineering learning goals to revised standards for technology education rather than to science standards, although the latter was seriously considered by state officials (McGrath, 2009)
From page 29...
... . Since 2007, an informal network of ocean literacy organizations has continued to refine this approach and recently released a set of "conceptual flow diagrams" linking the ocean literacy principles to specific learning goals in four K–12 grade bands (see http://www.coexploration.org/ocean literacy/usa/ocean_science_literacy/scope_and_sequence/home.html)
From page 30...
... Conclusion This chapter describes infusion and mapping as complementary approaches that offer alternatives to the development of stand-alone content standards for K–12 engineering education. Engineering-related ideas have already been infused into some national and state standards, and more infusion will be possible as existing standards are revised.
From page 31...
... 2010. Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
From page 32...
... 1996. National Science Education Standards.
From page 33...
... 2006. Draft Learning Progressions for Engineering Design.
From page 34...
... Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Higher Education Assessment Conference, Seattle, Washington, June 2003. Available online at http://www.jmu.edu/assessment/wm_library/Examinee_Motivation.pdf.
From page 35...
... 4 The core concepts, skills, and dispositions from the study were taken from the three principles outlined in NAE and NRC, 2009, Chapter 6. 5 Participants in the Childress and Rhodes Delphi study achieved consensus on 43 "outcome items" for high school students hoping to purse engineering in college.
From page 36...
... (2009) Literature review, focus groups, "reaction panel" NAE and NRC, Consensus study 2009 ASEE CMC (2008)


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.