Managing University Intellectual Property in the Public Interest (2011) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix A: Conference Agenda
Appendix A: Conference Agenda
Pages 83-90
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 83... ...
Louis, and Chair, Committee on Management of University Intellectual Property Mark Fishman, President, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, and Vice Chair, Committee on Management of University Intellectual Property 8:15 AM to 9:45 AM Session 1: Organization and evaluation of the technology transfer function within institutions Moderated by Wesley Cohen, Professor of Economics and Management, Duke University Panelists: 1. Martin Kenney, Professor of Human and Community Development, University of California at Davis 2.
|
From page 84... ...
9:45 AM to 10:15 AM Session 1 Open Discussion 10:30 AM to 12:00 PM Session 2: Effects of technology transfer and intellectual property management on the norms of the university Moderated by Margo Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Virginia
|
From page 85... ...
Has there been a more rapid or frequent application of research results in the marketplace? ⎯ Has university patenting in particular fields, e.g., biomedical research, inhibited access to foundational discoveries or research tools and thus caused investigators to abandon certain lines of research?
|
From page 86... ...
Allen Poirson, Director of Scientific Programs and Licensing, Glaucoma Research Foundation 4. Louise Perkins, Chief Scientific Officer, Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Discussion Questions: ⎯ Could the process of negotiating research sponsorship or patent licenses be made simpler and more transparent by standard terms, subject to "blockbuster insurance" ensuring appropriate payments to the university and inventor(s)
|
From page 87... ...
Case Grogan, Licensing Associate, California Institute of Technology 4. Steven Lazarus, Managing Director Emeritus, ARCH Venture Partners 5.
|
From page 88... ...
had any impact on licensing terms for university-generated patents? 9:45 AM to 10:15 AM Session 4: Open Discussion 10:30 AM to 12:00 PM Session 5: Alternatives to intellectual property-based, revenue-generating licenses in promoting technology transfer Moderated by Edward Lazowska, Bill and Melinda Gates Chair in Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington Panelists: 1.
|
From page 89... ...
⎯ Looking back over the past 20 years, what would you suggest are the most important metrics for assessing the impact of university technology transfer, in rank order? ⎯ How would you compare your rank-ordering to your perception of the motives and goals of the various "actors" in the process: university administrators, university technology transfer officers, faculty inventors, student inventors, regional economic development officials, established companies, venture investors, etc.?
|
From page 90... ...
Labeeb Abboud, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Discussion Questions: ⎯ What do we know about the adoption of policies within universities to specifically address humanitarian applications of university research results? Does the data indicate that universities could be doing more?
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.