Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust (2011) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix C: Clinical Practice Guideline Appraisal Tools
Appendix C: Clinical Practice Guideline Appraisal Tools
Pages 213-230
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 213... ...
Appendix C Clinical Practice Guideline Appraisal Tools 213
|
From page 214... ...
The guideline document provides specific information about situations in which clinical exceptions might be made in applying the guidelines.
|
From page 215... ...
d. The guideline document describes how patient preferences were taken into account during the guideline development process.
|
From page 216... ...
f. Given that a formal method of synthesis is used to combine the scientific evidence quantitatively or otherwise to develop summary outcome measures, the guideline document explicitly reports the results of that synthesis.
|
From page 217... ...
n. The guideline document provides a qualitative description of the health costs or expenditures that are expected from a specific health practice.
|
From page 218... ...
The guidelines describe the health condition to be prevented, detected, or treated in unambiguous terms.
|
From page 219... ...
c. Overall, potential biases and/or conflicts of interest appear to be adequately balanced or otherwise accounted for in the guideline development process.
|
From page 220... ...
AGREE II also includes 2 final overall assessment items that require the appraiser to make overall judgments of the practice guideline and consider how they rated the 23 items. AGREE II contains the same six domains as the original AGREE; changes to individual attributes of the domains are highlighted below in italics.
|
From page 221... ...
AGREE II: The guideline provides advice and/or tools on how the recommendations can be put into practice. Domain changes from clarity of presentation to applicability, and renumbered to 19.
|
From page 222... ...
The guideline is editorially independent from the funding body. AGREE II: The views of the functioning body have not influenced the content of the guideline.
|
From page 223... ...
as a measure for overall quality. Dimension one: Rigor of development process 1.
|
From page 224... ...
13. Is there an explicit link between the major recommendations and the level of supporting evidence?
|
From page 225... ...
6. Do the guidelines describe the condition to be detected, treated, or prevented in unambiguous terms?
|
From page 226... ...
Hayward et al.'s "Structured A structured format for abstracts The instrument includes eight topics essential to CPG Abstracts of CPGs" of articles describing CPGs to help developmental reporting. Format for structured abstracts of CPGs readers assess the applicability, Hayward et al.
|
From page 227... ...
3. The participants in the guideline development process and their areas of expertise are specified.
|
From page 228... ...
19. The effect on healthcare costs from specific health practices is specified.
|
From page 229... ...
The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.