Skip to main content

Finding What Works in Health Care Standards for Systematic Reviews (2011) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

Appendix C: Workshop Agenda and Questions to Panelists
Pages 243-248

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 243...
... 8:00 Breakfast served 8:30 Welcome and Introductory Remarks Alfred O Berg, Chair, Institute of Medicine Committee 8:45 Systematic Review Experts Panel Kalipso Chalkidou, Director, NICE International, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Naomi Aronson, Executive Director, Technology Evaluation Center, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association David B
Read the entire page →
From page 244...
... Jacques, Director, Coverage & Analysis Group, Office of Clinical Standards & Quality, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Alan Rosenberg, Vice President of Technology Assessment, WellPoint Health Networks Edmund Pezalla, National Medical Director and Chief Clinical Officer, Aetna Pharmacy Management Moderator: Paul Wallace, Medical Director, The Permanente Federation, Kaiser Permanente 12:00 Lunch 12:30 Consumer Panel Gail Shearer, Former Director, Consumer Reports Best Buy Drugs, and Former Director, Health Policy Analysis, Consumers Union David Shern, President and Chief Executive Officer, Mental Health America Carol Sakala, Director of Programs, Childbirth Connection Moderator: Katie Maslow, Director, Policy Development, Alzheimer's Association 1:30 Adjourn
Read the entire page →
From page 245...
... •  What  would  be  the  implications  if  the  IOM  were  to  rec ommend a standard grading scheme for characterizing the strength of evidence? Professional Specialty Societies Panel •  Does your organization produce its own SRs?
Read the entire page →
From page 246...
... Are there steps in your SR process that could be standardized? •  What would be the implications for your organization if the  IOM were to recommend a standard grading scheme for characterizing the strength of evidence?
Read the entire page →
From page 247...
... •  What would be the implications for consumers if the IOM  were to recommend a standard grading scheme for charac terizing the strength of evidence?
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • grading scheme
  • specialty societies
  • standard grading
  • perspective panel
  • address potential

  • former director
  • societies panel
  • medical director
  • experts panel
  • payer perspective

  • review experts
  • systematic review
  • consumer panel
  • evaluation center
  • technology evaluation

  • edmund pezalla
  • paul wallace
  • national medical
  • aetna pharmacy
  • clinical officer

  • health networks
  • pharmacy management
  • blue cross
  • bloomberg school
  • organization participate

  • buy drugs
  • blue shield
  • david shern
  • clinical practice
  • alan rosenberg


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.