Skip to main content

Critical Needs and Gaps in Understanding Prevention, Amelioration, and Resolution of Lyme and Other Tick-Borne Diseases The Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes: Workshop Report (2011) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

Appendix B: Federal Funding of Tick-Borne Diseases
Pages 497-508

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 497...
... Nine United States agencies2 have allocated this funding 1Only studies with a monetary funding amount were used in the analysis. 2The data provided for this analysis included studies from the following organizations: NIH-NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases)
Read the entire page →
From page 498...
... 498 CRITICAL RESEARCH NEEDS IN TICK-BORNE DISEASES FIGURE B-1 Total allocation of funding for tick-borne disease studies by agency/ organization, 2006–2010. FIGURE B-2 Annual proportion of agency/organization funding for tick-borne disease studies by year, 2006–2010.
Read the entire page →
From page 500...
... Note that the annual total of funding had a significant drop ($12.4m) in 2010 since the provided data for analysis did not list any 2010 studies funded by the NIH-NIAID.
Read the entire page →
From page 501...
... in 2010 since the provided data for analysis did not list any 2010 studies funded by the NIH-NIAID. There were 304 Microbiological studies between 2006 and 2010 averaging $42m for annual funding, while Prevention/Education totaled 77 studies and averaged $16.8m for annual funding between 2006 and 2010.
Read the entire page →
From page 503...
... Treatment, Environmental, and Surveillance, studies were all low in proportion to the other study types, but all three remained relatively stable from 2006 to 2010. Tick-Borne Disease by Study Topic (Pathogen, Tick, Host)
Read the entire page →
From page 504...
... in 2010 since the provided data for analysis did not list any 2010 studies funded by the NIH-NIAID. There were 343 Pathogen studies between 2006 and 2010 averaging $49m for annual funding, while Clinical Impact studies totaled 64 and averaged $14.3m.
Read the entire page →
From page 505...
... $62,863,944 $57,183,511 $59,127,804 $66,593,207 $1,469,003 $49,447,494 Clinical Impact (64) $28,775,092 $27,390,105 $6,225,497 $9,224,861 $14,329,111 Inclusive (17)
Read the entire page →
From page 506...
... 506 CRITICAL RESEARCH NEEDS IN TICK-BORNE DISEASES FIGURE B-6 Annual proportion of funding for tick-borne disease study topics by year, 2006–2010. FIGURE B-7 Total allocation of funding for tick-borne disease studies by pathogen type, 2006–2010.
Read the entire page →
From page 507...
... in 2010 since the provided data for analysis did not list any 2010 studies funded by the NIH-NIAID. Francisella studies received the most funding, followed by Borrelia studies.
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • annual funding
  • study topic
  • study type
  • clinical impact
  • study types

  • total allocation
  • yearly total
  • impact studies
  • annual proportion
  • pathogen type

  • pathogen studies
  • studies totaled
  • study topics
  • diseases study
  • six study

  • study falls
  • microbiological studies
  • disease funding
  • funding study
  • topic categories

  • type categories
  • including human
  • national wildlife
  • skin diseases
  • health command

  • slowly decreased
  • remained relatively
  • allocated funding
  • data provided
  • cdc increased


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.