Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix: Workshop Agenda
Pages 59-66

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 59...
... The workshop agenda will reflect the need to integrate the patient perspective in cancer treatment planning and will highlight some best practices in care planning that are currently being utilized by a number of practitioners. The workshop will include an overview of patient-centered care and cancer treatment planning, as well as sessions on shared decision making, communication in the cancer care setting, and patient experiences with cancer treatment.
From page 60...
... Session 1: Workshop Overview Betty Ferrell, City of Hope National Medical Center, Workshop Co-chair Ellen Stovall, National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, Workshop Co-chair Patient perspective • ichard Boyajian, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute R Defining patient-centered care • arolyn Clancy, Agency for Healthcare Research and C Quality Cancer treatment planning: A means to deliver quality, patient-centered care • atricia Ganz, University of California, Los Angeles P 10:00 a.m. Break 10:15 a.m.
From page 61...
... • ancy Keating, Harvard Medical School and N Brigham and Women's Hospital Decision quality • aren Sepucha, Massachusetts General Hospital and K Harvard Medical School Incorporation of comparative effectiveness research (CER) into shared decision making: Promises and challenges • heldon Greenfield, University of California, Irvine S Shared decision making in practice • effrey Peppercorn, Duke University J Discussion (30 minutes)
From page 62...
... Eliciting patient preferences and preparing patients to shape their care • herrie Kaplan, University of California, Irvine S Culturally appropriate communication and care • inda Burhansstipanov, Native American Cancer L Research Corporation Physician perspectives on communication • nthony Back, University of Washington A Oncology nurses: Leveraging an underutilized communication resource in cancer treatment planning • arie Bakitas, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical M Center Psychosocial provider perspectives on communication • lizabeth Clark, National Association of Social E Workers Patient navigation • ngelina Esparza, American Cancer Society Patient A Navigator Program Discussion (30 minutes) Questions: • ow can we ensure that healthcare professionals are H prepared to engage patients and family members (including adult learners, people in distress, older adults)
From page 63...
... Session 4: Patient Perspectives Moderator: Patricia Ganz, University of California, Los Angeles This panel discussion will offer an opportunity for patients and family members to describe their experience with cancer treatment and to react to workshop presentations and discussions. Panel Discussion • obert Erwin, Marti Nelson Cancer Foundation R • ark Gorman, National Coalition for Cancer M Survivorship • nne Willis, National Coalition for Cancer A Survivorship Questions: • hat is your (or your family member's)
From page 64...
... In addition, speakers and discussions will focus on how quality metrics and electronic tools can impact the implementation and effectiveness of cancer treatment planning. Models Evaluating treatment plans and summary templates in the Breast Cancer Registry Pilot • nn Partridge, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute A Lessons learned in survivorship planning • eborah Mayer, University of North Carolina D Advance care planning • homas Smith, Virginia Commonwealth University T Massey Cancer Center Chronic care model • d Wagner, MacColl Institute-Group Health E Research Institute Tools and Metrics to Facilitate Cancer Treatment Planning Electronic health records and care planning • awrence Shulman, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute L Measuring effectiveness: Quality metrics in cancer treatment planning • ussell Hoverman, Texas Oncology and US R Oncology
From page 65...
... Panelists and workshop participants can describe some of the lessons learned from past experiences with cancer treatment planning and have the opportunity to comment on important components of treatment planning that may improve oncology care. Discussions may also focus on policy or research needs that may encourage greater use of treatment planning in the future.
From page 66...
... • hat are the research priorities for driving policy W and practice? • hat incentives could encourage greater engagement W in cancer treatment planning by patients, professionals, and healthcare institutions?


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.