Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

3 Recognizing and Assessing Child Maltreatment
Pages 15-24

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 15...
... Two speakers at the workshop discussed the progress that has been made in recognizing and assessing child maltreatment from both a physical and a mental health standpoint. MEDICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL ASSESSMENT AND DIAGNOSIS OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT The first epidemiological study of child maltreatment appeared in an article titled "The Battered-Child Syndrome" (Kempe et al., 1962)
From page 16...
... "Many of us know physicians who have made the wrong diagnosis and have sent abused children home, and sometimes those children come back with more serious injuries due to abuse or even die from an abusive injury. We take these problems very seriously." An additional problem cited by Leventhal is that some so-called experts in court continue to deny that abuse has occurred and propose specious theories of causation, such as vitamin deficiencies or reactions to vaccines.
From page 17...
... . In Connecticut, for example, MDTs can include prosecutors, CPS workers, physicians, forensic interviewers, social workers, mental health treatment staff, and school social workers.
From page 18...
... Finally, individual family variables have received a moderate amount of research. These variables include domestic violence, substance abuse, and the mental health of parents.
From page 19...
... Who has access to them? " Also, Joy Osofsky of the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center recommended doing research in cooperation with CACs, which Leventhal labeled an excellent idea.
From page 20...
... "Doing mental health types of assessments for the purposes of service planning is a well-accepted operation within the child welfare system." Assessment frameworks point to multiple sources of information, including the child, siblings, parents, other caregivers, teachers, family members, and peers. The "gatherers" of information include departments of social services, guardians ad litem, forensic interviewers, medical providers, mental health providers, victim advocates, law enforcement, and
From page 21...
... Targets for information gathering include family and social history, abuse history, other trauma history, anxiety, depression, behavior problems, delinquency, substance abuse, academic performance, social functioning and support, and family functioning and support. Outcomes of Assessments Despite the attention devoted to assessments, not much research has examined whether they improve outcomes for children, particularly mental health outcomes.
From page 22...
... Future Research on Assessment Saunders concluded by listing a number of critical research questions, many of which involve implementation:  Within the context of frontline child welfare practice, how well do current (and proposed) assessment tools and procedures identi fy children with particular problems who likely need mental health services?
From page 23...
...  Does greater coordination of assessment tasks with community resources and the family result in better assessment? Discussion During the discussion session, Clare Anderson from the ACYF pointed to research showing that increased mental health assessment can lead to the increased use of psychotropic medications among children in foster care.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.