Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix A: Narrative, Numeric, and Proposed Florida Nutrient Criteria Processes Illustrated
Pages 119-126

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 119...
... , while ovals represent terminal points in the process -- a beginning or an ending. Circles and pentagons transfer the reader to other points in the processes where the next sequential step occurs if it does not directly follow the previous step in the overall process.
From page 120...
... 120 EPA'S ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF NUTRIENT STANDARDS IN FLORIDA FIGURE A-1 Process for Narrative Nutrient Criteria
From page 121...
... 121 APPENDIX A FIGURE A-2 Process for Numeric Nutrient Criteria in Flowing Waters
From page 122...
... 122 * See notes on page 123 FIGURE A-3 Process for Florida's Proposed Nutrient Criteria
From page 123...
... From Page From Page 122, Step 9 122, Step 2c To Step 1, Page122 123 FIGURE A-3 Process for Florida's Proposed Nutrient Criteria
From page 124...
... Once a determination is made regarding whether sufficient data exist and whether the data point to nutrients as a stressor, then the water is listed as impaired, a TMDL developed, and load reduction implemented through a BMAP. By contrast, the EPA numeric process (Figure A-2)
From page 125...
... This additional study necessarily results in added time required to reach the TMDL stage in the overall process. The EPA numeric process opts to minimize Type II error -- not listing a waterbody as impaired that is truly impaired.
From page 126...
... Proposed Rule 62-303 – Identification of Impaired Surface Waters http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/wqssp/nutrients/docs/meetings/ 62_303_final.pdf


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.