The National Academies Press

Currently Skimming:

T57054 txt_037.pdf
Pages 48-48

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.

From page 48... ... 40 INNOVATIONS IN TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING, VOLUME 2 TABLE 2 CTPP 2000 Journeys (Scaled to Modeled Work Tours) District 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 - CBD 535 243 33 33 47 7 2 - OSU 4,006 6,094 833 1,030 1,023 127 3 - Clintonville 3,609 3,001 2,256 1,127 1,517 311 4 - Worthington 3,761 2,509 1,380 3,745 3,499 505 5 - Crosswoods 3,730 1,633 1,051 1,733 6,194 1,192 6 - Polaris 698 321 240 312 995 995 Corridor Total 16,341 13,801 5,793 7,982 13,275 3,137 7 - Delaware 3,318 1,524 844 1,012 3,887 2,948 8 - NW 16,883 9,268 3,567 2,517 6,983 1,469 9 - NE 11,278 3,910 1,849 3,469 6,704 1,253 10 - SE 16,179 4,264 1,495 1,948 3,585 477 11 - SW 7,675 2,338 1,104 950 2,191 315 12 -Licking 2,437 667 310 642 1,429 268 13 - Other 4,594 1,221 524 621 1,395 283 Noncorridor Total 62,364 23,192 9,693 11,159 26,174 7,012 Regional Total 78,704 36,993 15,486 19,141 39,449 10,149 TABLE 3 Ratio of Model over Scaled CTPP District 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 - CBD 0.52 0.63 1.40 1.02 1.13 0.96 2 - OSU 0.91 0.59 1.52 1.05 1.11 1.58 3 - Clintonville 1.03 0.85 0.71 1.28 1.11 0.75 4 - Worthington 1.09 0.76 1.04 0.68 1.02 1.06 5 - Crosswoods 0.86 0.94 1.17 1.20 0.83 0.92 6 - Polaris 0.90 0.91 0.90 1.22 1.24 0.47 Corridor Total 0.95 0.73 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.81 7 - Delaware 0.85 0.81 0.96 1.55 1.14 0.63 8 - NW 0.93 0.88 1.24 1.57 1.05 1.00 9 - NE 1.04 1.31 1.54 1.21 0.97 0.92 10 - SE 1.07 1.50 1.32 1.02 0.70 0.82 11 - SW 0.95 1.94 1.07 1.08 0.56 0.74 12 - Licking 1.09 1.22 1.31 1.12 0.77 0.94 13 - Other 1.06 1.29 1.17 0.94 0.84 0.93 Noncorridor Total 1.00 1.20 1.26 1.26 0.93 0.80 Regional Total 0.99 1.03 1.17 1.13 0.94 0.80 TABLE 4 2000 Modeled Tours (All Purposes) Read the entire page →

From page 48...

... 40 INNOVATIONS IN TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING, VOLUME 2 TABLE 2 CTPP 2000 Journeys (Scaled to Modeled Work Tours) District 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 - CBD 535 243 33 33 47 7 2 - OSU 4,006 6,094 833 1,030 1,023 127 3 - Clintonville 3,609 3,001 2,256 1,127 1,517 311 4 - Worthington 3,761 2,509 1,380 3,745 3,499 505 5 - Crosswoods 3,730 1,633 1,051 1,733 6,194 1,192 6 - Polaris 698 321 240 312 995 995 Corridor Total 16,341 13,801 5,793 7,982 13,275 3,137 7 - Delaware 3,318 1,524 844 1,012 3,887 2,948 8 - NW 16,883 9,268 3,567 2,517 6,983 1,469 9 - NE 11,278 3,910 1,849 3,469 6,704 1,253 10 - SE 16,179 4,264 1,495 1,948 3,585 477 11 - SW 7,675 2,338 1,104 950 2,191 315 12 -Licking 2,437 667 310 642 1,429 268 13 - Other 4,594 1,221 524 621 1,395 283 Noncorridor Total 62,364 23,192 9,693 11,159 26,174 7,012 Regional Total 78,704 36,993 15,486 19,141 39,449 10,149 TABLE 3 Ratio of Model over Scaled CTPP District 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 - CBD 0.52 0.63 1.40 1.02 1.13 0.96 2 - OSU 0.91 0.59 1.52 1.05 1.11 1.58 3 - Clintonville 1.03 0.85 0.71 1.28 1.11 0.75 4 - Worthington 1.09 0.76 1.04 0.68 1.02 1.06 5 - Crosswoods 0.86 0.94 1.17 1.20 0.83 0.92 6 - Polaris 0.90 0.91 0.90 1.22 1.24 0.47 Corridor Total 0.95 0.73 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.81 7 - Delaware 0.85 0.81 0.96 1.55 1.14 0.63 8 - NW 0.93 0.88 1.24 1.57 1.05 1.00 9 - NE 1.04 1.31 1.54 1.21 0.97 0.92 10 - SE 1.07 1.50 1.32 1.02 0.70 0.82 11 - SW 0.95 1.94 1.07 1.08 0.56 0.74 12 - Licking 1.09 1.22 1.31 1.12 0.77 0.94 13 - Other 1.06 1.29 1.17 0.94 0.84 0.93 Noncorridor Total 1.00 1.20 1.26 1.26 0.93 0.80 Regional Total 0.99 1.03 1.17 1.13 0.94 0.80 TABLE 4 2000 Modeled Tours (All Purposes)

Read the entire page →

Key Terms

← Previous Chapter Skim

Next Chapter Skim →

This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.

T57054 txt_037.pdf Pages 48-48

T57054 txt_037.pdf
Pages 48-48