Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 22-26

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 22...
... The details of the workshop efforts are documented in Appendix I The recommendations for changes to the pedestrian signal warrant submitted to the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices in June 2005 and January 2006 are in Appendix B
From page 23...
... Only applies to Warrants 2 and 3. b The minimum minor road volume occurs when the major street volume is approximately 1,450 veh/h or at 1,050 veh/h when the community is less than 10,000 or the speed on the major road exceeds 40 mph (64 km/h)
From page 24...
... The pedestrian signal warrant also included the same reduction factor until the 1988 revision. • Pedestrian Delay.
From page 25...
... The Texas study provided interesting findings; however, only using engineers from one state was a concern. For this TCRP/NCHRP study, the timing and location of the 2004 Institute of Transportation Engineers Spring Conference provided an opportunity to host a workshop on engineering judgment evaluations of pedestrian signal warrants that could include a more diverse geographic representation.
From page 26...
... • The revised warrant should consider the operating or posted speed on the major roadway. • Several participants commented on treating pedestrians and vehicles equally.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.