Skip to main content

Environmental Neurotoxicology (1992) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

Executive Summary
Pages 1-8

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 1...
... The committee, charged to review the biologic principles and mechanisms of neurotoxic action relevant to risk assessment, produced this report, which discusses the magnitude of the problem of neurotic effects, testing strategies, surveillance efforts, biologic markers, and risk assessment. MAGNITUDE OF THE PROBLEM Neurotomcity caused by environmental to~ncants results in a range of neurologic and Environment is defined broadly in this document to encompass a wide range of external factors that can cause injury, including diet, ethanol, tobacco, drugs, and occupational exposures, as well as toxic contaminants in what are ordinarily considered components of the ambient environment—air, water, and soil.
From page 2...
... The committee recommends that more accurate estimates of the extent of the problem of neurolo~c and psychiatric dysfunction attributable to chemical agents in the environment be developed. ENVIRONMENTAL NEUROTOXICOLOGY The estimates must be based on a combination of clinical, epidemiologic, and to~ncologic studies coupled with the techniques of quantitative risk assessment.
From page 3...
... Testing in the second and third tiers of future test systems should expose false positives; the abandonment of an occasional new chemical on the basis of what are actually false-positive screening results is the likely cost of this process. 3 The committee recommends that a ratiosal, cost-effective neuroto~ncity testing strate~ be adopted.
From page 4...
... Epidemiologic studies will increasingly need to use biologic markers of exposure, of effects, and of susceptibility. The committee recommends that exposure-surveillance systems cover a much broader range of chemicals and use improved monitoring techniques for long-term assessment.
From page 5...
... The primary goal of the incorporation of biologic markers into such studies should be to validate their predictive accuracy and to test hypothesized quantitative relationships between specific markers related to causal pathways involving newotomc outcomes. NEUROTOXICI1~Y RISK ASSESSMENT Risk-assessment techniques provide a means for estimating the risks to humans associated with exposwe to toxic chemicals in the environment.
From page 6...
... Virtually all neurotoxicolog~c risk assessment today is limited to qualitative hazard identification and to the early stages of hazard characterization; neither sufficient data nor adequate paradigms are available to permit quantitative evaluation of most neurotomc risks. Risk-assessment techniques that incorporate more quantitative information about dose-time-response relationships and mechanisms of neurotoxicity are under development.
From page 7...
... Environmental Neurotoxicology


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.