Skip to main content

2013-2014 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory Interim Report (2014) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

Appendix C: Assessment Criteria
Pages 80-81

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 80...
... • Are programs crafted to employ the appropriate mix of theory, computation, and experimentation? To assist ARL in addressing promising technical approaches, the Board will also consider the following questions: • Are there especially promising projects that, with improved direction or resources, could produce outstanding results that can be transitioned ultimately to the field?
Read the entire page →
From page 81...
... b. Does the project plan clearly identify dependencies (i.e., successes depend on success of other activities within the project or outside developments)
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • professional activities
  • research challenge
  • transitioned ultimately
  • technical approaches
  • technical work

  • performing required
  • improved direction
  • panel participation
  • hypotheses appropriately
  • promising projects

  • demands technological
  • appropriate process
  • laboratory experiment
  • work reviewed
  • arltab applied

  • following metrics
  • identify dependencies
  • conference committees
  • appear reasonable
  • technical innovation

  • appropriately framed
  • equipment state
  • field test
  • addressing promising
  • project plan

  • assist arl
  • underlying science
  • conducted elsewhere
  • programs crafted
  • arl strengths


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.