Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Executive Summary
Pages 1-4

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 1...
... That understanding has led to increased attention to the fire growth parameters—ignition, flame spread, heat release rate, mass burning rate, and transport of combustion products as they impact toxic hazard. While smoke toxicity data are not, in themselves, measures of toxic hand, they may be used, together with fire performance data, to estimate toxic hazard.
From page 2...
... It is to be noted that the fire growth models require as input, information on the heat release/mass burning rates of the combustible material involved in the fire scenario. These data are inferred from certain laboratory fire tests, some of which have been or are being adopted as standards both in the United States (American Society for Testing and Materials)
From page 3...
... to ensure that the monitored toxicants account for the estimated toxic effects and that there is no evidence for unusual or unexplained toxicity. · Use experimentally determined toxic potency data for candidate materials and/or products in the hazard engineering calculations to characterize their relative fire safety implications.
From page 4...
... 4 In addition to acknowledging the value of well-instrumented testing over a range of spatial scales, the committee's overall recommendation is that the selection of candidate materials for use in transit vehicles should be made following analysis of each material's fire properties and smoke toxic potency within the context of specific plausible fire scenarios.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.