Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix L: Background Example Data for Sensitivity Analysis
Pages 87-98

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 87...
... Appendix L Background Example Data for Sensitivity Analysis 87
From page 88...
... Cost calculations are in Table L-3 and based on all fresh substitutions.
From page 89...
... , weighted in a 1:3 ratio using 1,000 and 1,300 (averaged from 1,200 and 1,400) calorie food patterns, following methodology applied by the IOM (2011)
From page 90...
... , c-eq/d 0.16 0.01 Change in food grp intake, c-eq/d 0.09 0.00 NOTES: c-eq = cup-equivalents; DFE = dietary folate equivalents; DGV = dark green vegetable; Nutr = nutrients; Red-Or = red and orange vegetable. a Weighted average of boiled white potatoes without peel and baked white potatoes with peel in a 2:1 ratio.
From page 91...
... Britten, USDA/CNPP, December 9, 2014) ; nutrient profiles from selected food items from USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Release 27 (USDA/ARS, 2014)
From page 92...
... 0.14 c-eq/d for white potatoes was used in this example with a 6 percent decrease in all other vegetable categories and no change in fruit. Cost calculations are in Table L-3 and based on all fresh substitutions.
From page 93...
... ; Nutrient intakes were compared to the RDA/ AI as listed in Table E-1.
From page 94...
... , 0.19 0.05 c-eq/d Change in food grp intake, c-eq/d 0.14 0.00 NOTES: c-eq/d = cup-equivalents/d; DFE = dietary folate equivalents; DGV = dark green vegetable; Nutr = nutrients; Red-Or = red and orange vegetable. a Weighted average of boiled white potatoes without peel and baked white potatoes with peel in a 2:1 ratio.
From page 95...
... . Nutrient profiles from selected food items from the USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Release 27 (USDA/ARS, 2014)
From page 96...
... 96 TABLE L-3  Cost Calculation of Fruit and Vegetable Groups Fresh Only Fresh, Canned, and Frozen Percent Percent Food group Food item Cost/c-eq weight Cost/lb Cost/c-eq weight Cost/lb White potatoes White potatoes, fresh 0.19 100.0 0.48 0.19 100.0 0.48 Weighted cost/c-eq 0.19 0.19 Other starchy veg Corn, yellow, fresh 1.17 9.8 1.80 1.17 0.0 1.80 Corn, yellow, canned 0.37 0.0 0.69 0.37 9.8 0.69 Green peas, frozen 0.51 0.0 1.34 0.51 5.3 1.34 Green peas, canned 0.43 0.0 0.74 0.43 5.3 0.74 Weighted cost/c-eq 1.17 0.42 Red-orange veg Tomatoes, fresh 1.28 70.9 2.94 1.28 70.9 2.94 Tomatoes, canned 0.41 0.0 0.77 0.41 70.9 0.77 Carrots, fresh 0.25 17.9 0.77 0.25 17.9 0.77 Weighted cost/c-eq 1.07 0.60 Dark green veg Broccoli, fresh 0.63 39.3 1.84 0.63 39.3 1.84 Leafy greens 1.95 25.0 0.40 1.95 25.0 0.40 Spinach, fresh 2.02 23.0 3.92 2.02 23.0 3.92 Spinach, frozen 0.96 0.0 1.51 0.96 23.0 1.51 Weighted cost/c-eq 1.37 1.29
From page 97...
... Only food items contributing 5 percent or more to the food group are included in the cost calculation. Percent weights reflect the percent contribution of the specific vegetable or fruit to the general vegetable or fruit subgroup.
From page 98...
... 2014. USDA national nutrient database for standard reference, release 27.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.