Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Disccusion
Pages 384-390

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 384...
... A copyright attorney in the audience expressed sympathy with Robert Lucky's comment about the establishment of technology standards and the inability of it&D-intensive companies to capture fully the benefit of many years of investment when the technology it has developed on a proprietary basis suddenly becomes the international standard. She noted, however, that there is a problem in developing consensual regulations when, for example, proprietary software is being included in a standard.
From page 385...
... unwillingness to recognize that it had lost its technological hegemony. He suggested that this raised again the question of whether the United States should support a differentiated or undifferentiated international intellectual property right (IPR)
From page 386...
... David Mowery: In my limited and perhaps somewhat heretical view, intellectual property reform bears a close relationship to antitrust reform in that these are gestures that do not have on-budget costs. The consequences are uncertain, but they are political gestures that certainly suggest that something is being done.
From page 387...
... In every case, we have submitted proposals that say we will work out the intellectual property rights if you give us the money. Everybody knows that if you bring in the {PR people, it will kill the whole thing.
From page 388...
... This may be due to external pressures in the global context that are causing many nations to redefine their selfinterest and to trade-related internal pressures stemming from entrepreneurial activity in the development of a domestic economy. It seems that those countries in which political, economic, and cultural ideologies are less strongly coupled probably will be able to adjust more rapidly than those countries where these ideologies are much more closely linked.
From page 389...
... Fifth, during the conference we discussed congruency in international IPR systems, which it seems to me is going to be more and more important because of the collapse in time and costs, as Robert Lucky points out in Chapter 16. If you look at the time span from the application for intellectual property protection, to the discovery of an infringement, to final litigation and eventual resolution, one could go through over that time span three or four product generations or product cycles; perhaps as many as 30 improvement patents; and in the case of biotechnology, perhaps three or four progeny generations.
From page 390...
... I expect chat this will be an expanding area of IPR protection, and the degree 10 which 01her parts of the IPR regime ~1 be able 10 adapt 10 it iS uncertain.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.