Skip to main content

Technology Processes of Assessment and Choice (1969) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

References and Notes
Pages 119-121

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 119...
... . For the latter, see, e.g., Advisory Committee on Government Programs in the Behavioral Sciences, National Research Council, The Behavioral Sciences and the Federal Government, NAS Publ.
Read the entire page →
From page 120...
... Arrow, for example, long ago demonstrated that, given certain natural conditions, there can exist no method of deriving social choices by aggregating individual preference patterns. In at least this sense, the Benthamite concept of the "greatest good for the greatest number'' is a logical impossibility.
Read the entire page →
From page 121...
... Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 93- 1 03 ( 1 968 )
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • law week
  • law review
  • government operations
  • highwa program
  • behavioral sciences

  • washington law
  • national highwa
  • unanticipated environmental
  • senate committee
  • planning association

  • tional planning
  • nas publ
  • individual preference
  • damages caused
  • natural conditions

  • university program
  • deriving social
  • intergovernmental relations
  • ford law
  • assessment seminar

  • gladwin hill
  • health science
  • stan ford
  • traffic accidents
  • soc ial

  • oversimplified views
  • political economy
  • traffic safety
  • preference patterns
  • ial sciences


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.