Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

6 THE INFLUENCE OF ORGANIZATIONAL LINKAGES AND MEASUREMENT PRACTICES ON PRODUCTIVITY AND MANAGEMENT
Pages 131-160

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 131...
... 3. There is a paradox, and addressing it is confounded by the lack of systems thinking, lack of profound knowledge, and inadequate measurement methodology.
From page 132...
... Defining specifically what linkages are expected is critical in developing a performance measurement methodology. Much evaluation research simplistically assumes that an improvement at one organizational level wall automatically cause an improvement at another level.
From page 133...
... makes decisions and takes actions aimed at improving the performance of the organizational system. Performance is multidimensional, and ambiguity and inconsistency regarding the criteria for measuring are major problems common to researchers and practitioners involved with the measurement of organizational performance.
From page 134...
... Our ongoing and recently updated review of the literature (in preparation) confirms that there are at least seven interrelated and interdependent performance criteria for an organizational system: (1)
From page 135...
... Quality is pervasive throughout the organizational system. One can stop short of a thorough operational definition of quality by espousing the overly simplistic but often-cited adages "quality is conformance to requirements" and "quality is making the customer happy." However, one can do business with an operational definition (Deming, 19861.
From page 136...
... SMITH OR. yields five quality checkpoints (see Figure 6-2)
From page 137...
... This is clearly a linkage issue relative to individual- and group-focused performance improvement processes. Historically, U.S.
From page 138...
... SOURCE: Sink (1993~. MEASUREMENT, LINKAGES, AND MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: FOUR GUIDELINES A management team makes decisions and takes actions aimed at (1)
From page 139...
... the relationships across organizational levels, or even to assess organizational performance and productivity completely. Guideline 1: The Measurement System Should Support the Organization*
From page 140...
... Measuring and feeding back the results of positively regarded behavior can increase its frequency of occurrence, and measuring and reporting unacceptable behavior can decrease its frequency of occurrence (Fists and Posner, 1968:26-319. Designers and users of management information systems must realize that performance measures provide KOR and must take positive action to take advantage of their effects.
From page 141...
... Whether on the shop floor, at a retail sales counter, or in a classroom, the operational decisions that must be made are typically for action in the immediate planning horizon. Making a process adjustment, responding to a customer complaint, or finding a new way to explain a particularly difficult concept requires knowledge of the situa
From page 142...
... At the work-group level, planning a monthly production schedule, determining the number of additional clerks to call in for the upcoming sales period, or establishing the annual roster of course offerings is a tactical issue and has a longer planning horizon (typically measured in weeks or months)
From page 143...
... (19901: "Translating the strategic goals of the organization into the performance measurement system provides management with a means to manage change and channel employee behavior. Proactive management suggests that changing measurements and incentives are critical." For both sets of authors above, the ability of an organization to adapt its system of measurement is a seminal feature of the management information system and a key to success.
From page 144...
... The principles of material velocity management presented in Goldratt and Cox's (1986) highly acclaimed and widely read work The Goal dictate that manufacturing cells only produce in quantities demanded by customer orders, not to the capacity of the cell.
From page 145...
... (1990:118) point out, "For control of factory operations, the traditional accounting measures are too irrelevant due to allocations, too vague due to 'doliarization,' too late due to accounting period delays, and too summarized due to the length of the accounting period." The problem of inappropriate cost-based measures that confronts manufacturers also applies to the service sector and to office, professional, and technical settings.
From page 146...
... FIGURE 6-4 Improved management systems are required to ensure continuous performance improvement. SOURCE: Adapted from Kurstedt (19861; Sink and Tuttle (19891.
From page 147...
... The five lines passing through the decision-to-action interface represent improvement interventions being made at the five key quality checkpoints in the management system. (Recall that the quality checkpoints are (1)
From page 148...
... Figure 6-5 depicts how performance measurement and continuous improvement are built into a strategic management planning process. Measurement supports and enhances strategic plans aimed at performance improvement.
From page 149...
... ~ - o E E in, 3 o ._ N Ct o U)
From page 150...
... Listed below are issues, principles, and assumptions associated with the development of measurement for world-class competition, many of which challenge existing paradigms: · The goal is to design, develop, and implement successfully measurement systems that share information and thereby support and enhance continuous performance improvement. · Organizations that learn faster than their competitors have little to fear.
From page 151...
... · A performance measurement system must not appear to those involved as simply a passing fad (Morris et al., 1977~. · The measurement system must clearly fit into the management process and be acknowledged as decision making and problem solving aimed at supporting performance improvement.
From page 152...
... In order to understand linkage issues, to measure their effects, and to predict their impact so that valid performance evaluation can be conducted at various organizational levels, the design of the measurement systems will have to be approached much more systematically. identifying Suitable Measures Designers of a measurement system must be aware of the attributes of numerous possible performance measures.
From page 153...
... They illustrate the basic principle that performance measurements must be uniquely appropriate to the individual, group, or organization in their most elementary attributes. Key Design Variables The foregoing issues and principles translate into design variables for developing an organizational performance measurement system.
From page 154...
... Key design variables, such as the unit of analysis, user purpose, and operational definitions of measures, must be addressed and specified if the measurement system is to be successful. Specifying the unit of analysis entails defining the organizational system for which the performance measurement system is being established.
From page 155...
... Once the hierarchy of measures is determined, specific indicators must be established, operational definitions written, the measurement-to-data interface determined, and ultimately, the user interfaces and utilization completed. In the final analysis, however, examining the organization and designing the measurement system and the management information system can only do so much.
From page 156...
... industry may not have worked out the theory or the underlying mechanisms, but in material velocity management, for example, they have sensed one of the keys to achieving "the goal." Organizations can put the information system to work to enhance their ability to achieve that goal. We have discussed how the performance measurement system can provide management with information and a mechanism to reinforce behaviors consistent with organizational goals.
From page 157...
... In order to address the productivity paradox and organizational linkages methodologically or quantitatively, several prerequisites must be resolved. First, profound knowledge of productivity and quality improvement is necessary to model and predict improvement in an entity.
From page 158...
... · Determine if the reluctance to make performance improvement interventions is due to lack of information. If so, concentrate on evaluating candidate performance improvement interventions from a systems perspective.
From page 159...
... Nanni, and T.E. Vollmann lsso The New Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations for World Class Competition.
From page 160...
... Sink, D.S. 1993 Developing measurement systems for world class competition.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.