Review of the 21st Century Truck Partnership Third Report (2015) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
2 Management Strategy and Priority Setting
2 Management Strategy and Priority Setting
Pages 19-25
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 19... ...
Government agencies request funding from Contations included detailed responses to the concerns about gress through the administration and work with the industrial the program's overall effectiveness, funding mechanisms, partners and research organizations, including universities priority setting, Partnership coordination and performance, and government laboratories, to establish research programs and other 21CTP issues raised in the National Research that meet national priorities and the interests of industry. Council's Phase 1 (NRC, 2008)
|
From page 20... ...
Note, however, that DOE 21CTP activity (which accounts In Finding S-1 of the NRC Phase 2 report, it was noted for 78 percent of total 21CTP funding) falls under the Energy that the Partnership needs to review whether additional partPolicy Act of 2005, which requires a 20 percent cost share for ners -- such as major truck and component manufacturers that R&D projects and a 50 percent cost share for demonstration are not currently members but that could contribute to the and commercial application projects (such as SuperTruck)
|
From page 21... ...
pose of these meetings is to discuss 21CPT activities for the The other program management recommendation in the month and make any appropriate planning decisions that are NRC Phase 2 report dealt with the lack of a clearly defined best facilitated by a small representative group. inventory of projects and budgets included under the 21CTP The Partnership also holds regular teleconference meet- umbrella, and recommended a brief annual report documentings of its full membership once a month.
|
From page 22... ...
These connections A committee subgroup visited Oak Ridge National Labora- are important for encouraging students to work on research tory on October 22, 2014, to review the activities related to projects related to the automotive industry so that there will 21CTP. Participation in 21CTP fosters ongoing technical be a next generation of engineers educated for government interchange with industry at the working level, facilitating and industry.
|
From page 23... ...
selections are reviewed each year at the Annual Merit Review, and The NRC Phase 1 report recommended the creation of "a changes to portfolio components can be made as a result of that portfolio management process that sets priorities and aligns feedback. budgets among the agencies and industrial partners" (NRC, 2008; Recommendation 2-2)
|
From page 24... ...
, and the SuperTruck projects have an annual FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS reporting requirement, there remains no dedicated report on In summary, the 21CTP continues to operate as a virtual 21CTP activities, in any medium. In response to prior NRC network of government agencies, industry, and national recommendations, DOE has proposed the development of laboratories, led by DOE using a relatively flat and infor- such a report and given the committee a first draft proposal.
|
From page 25... ...
2006. 21st Century Truck Part nership Roadmap and Technical White Papers.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.