Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 91-116

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 91...
... Appendix D: Missouri Dashboard D-1
From page 94...
... Revised June 17, 2003 Performance Measure Trend Comments Take better care of what we have Traffic fatal and injury crash rates compared to national average Y Fatal and injury crash rates (2001) – Trend for fatal crash rate is decreasing but rate still higher than national rate; the injury crash rate is meeting the performance goal (Pages 1 & 2)
From page 95...
... Distribution of funds G FY 2002 indicates construction and maintenance expenditures continue to comprise the largest expenditures of the department (Page 20) Revenue dispersion G Revenue dispersion is relatively constant.
From page 96...
... TTake Traffic fatal and injury crash rates compared to national average Strategic Goal: Improve safety on the transportation system Performance Goal/Target: The goal is for Missouri's state system fatal and injury crash rates to be less than the national fatal and injury crash rates Green - Both fatal and injury crash rates for Missouri are less than the national fatal and injury crash rates. Yellow - Only one of Missouri's crash rates, fatal or injury, is lower than the national fatal and injury crash rates.
From page 97...
... Fatal and Injury Crash Rates (state system compared to national average) 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 F a ta l R a te 0 20 40 60 80 In ju ry R a te MO - Fatal 1.79 1.73 1.57 1.55 1.5 National - Fatal 1.46 1.41 1.38 1.36 1.36 MO - Injury 61.46 61.82 56.03 53.98 54.64 National - Injury 83.88 77.09 76.33 75.27 72.01 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 D-7
From page 98...
... TTake State system traffic fatality and injury crash trend Strategic Goal: Improve safety on the transportation system Performance Goal/Target: The goal is to decrease fatality and injury crash trends on all Missouri roads. Green - Both fatality and injury crash rates for Missouri show a downward trend Yellow - Only one of Missouri's crash rates, fatality or injury, is a downward trend Red - Both fatality and injury crash rates for Missouri show an upward trend Performance Measures: (1)
From page 99...
... Fatalities and Injuries (all Missouri roads) 1,000 1,050 1,100 1,150 1,200 1,250 1,300 1,350 1,400 F a ta li ti e s 50,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 90,000 In ju ri e s Fatalities 1,192 1,169 1,094 1,157 1,098 Injuries 81,570 79,765 78,297 76,338 73,618 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 D-9
From page 100...
... Percent of major highway miles in good or better condition Strategic Goal: Improve the condition of the state's roads and bridges Performance Goal/Target: Increase the number of miles considered in good or better condition to: 50 percent on National Highway System (NHS) and remaining arterials with the additional stipulation that 85 - 90 percent of the Interstate must meet the condition goal Green - Greater than 1 percent increase Yellow - 0-1 percent increase Red - Any decrease Performance Measures: Lane miles of pavement that meet the desired condition measure, based on the International Roughness Index (IRI)
From page 101...
... Percent of Major Highways in Good or Better Condition 20 30 40 50 60 1 9 9 8 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 Year P e rc e n t M e e ti n g G o a l Major Highways (Missouri) Major Highways (National Avg.)
From page 102...
... Take Better Care of Percent of deficient bridges Strategic Goal: Improve the condition of the state's roads and bridges Performance Goal/Target: Reduce the number of deficient bridges Green - Greater than 1.0 percent decrease Yellow - 0 – 1.0 percent reduction Red - Greater than 1.0 percent increase Performance Measures: Percent of deficient bridges on the state system Additional Information: Deficient structures are determined using Federal Highway Administration criteria for all structures submitted as part of the National Bridge Inventory. This analyses is based on load capacity, physical condition and geometrics.
From page 103...
... TTake Roadway Congestion Index for Kansas City and St. Louis compared to national average Strategic Goal: Improve safety on the transportation system Performance Goal/Target: The goal is to keep the trend for Roadway Congestion Index (RCI)
From page 104...
... Roadway Congestion Index (St. Louis & Kansas City MPO vs.
From page 105...
... TAK Percentage of statewide striping program completed Strategic Goal: Improve the safety of Missouri's transportation system Performance Goal/Target: Centerline stripe on 100% of programmed line miles for calendar year 2003 Edgeline stripe on 100% of programmed line miles for calendar year 2003 Green - Measure under development – definition to be determined Yellow - Measure under development – definition to be determined Red - Measure under development – definition to be determined Performance Measures: 100% completion of striping for calendar year 2003 Additional Information: Centerline stripe all roads Edgeline stripe all roads > 1000 average daily traffic * In process of gathering data – this is an example.
From page 106...
... TAK Mowing costs vs. herbicide costs Strategic Goal: Improve maintenance of the state's highway system Performance Goal/Target: Remain below the baseline for mowing costs Remain above the baseline for herbicide costs Green - Mowing costs are below the baseline and herbicide costs are above the baseline Yellow - Mowing costs and herbicide costs both increase Red - Mowing costs are above the baseline and herbicide costs are below the baseline Performance Measures: Mowing costs vs.
From page 107...
... 5 YEAR HISTORY OF MoDOT'S MOWING & HERBICIDE COSTS PER CALENDAR YEAR 2,000,000 6,000,000 10,000,000 14,000,000 18,000,000 22,000,000 26,000,000 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 CALENDAR YEAR Mowing Herbicide * Denotes baseline D-17
From page 108...
... Take Net assets at year end Strategic Goal: Demonstrate responsible use of taxpayers' money Performance Goal/Target: The department's overall financial condition will improve or remain steady over the past year. Green - Net assets remain stable or increase at year end Yellow - Net assets at year end are $250 million - $500 million less than previous year Red - Net assets at year end are less than the previous year by $500 million or more Performance Measures: Net assets at year end Additional Information: Net assets, as reported below, include all assets of the department, including capital assets (with infrastructure)
From page 109...
... Percentage of dollars delivered as programmed Strategic Goal: Deliver the STIP on time and within budget Performance Goal/Target: Deliver projects within 5% of dollars programmed Green - <5% of dollars programmed Yellow - between >5% – 10% of dollars programmed Red - >10% of dollars programmed Performance Measures: Percentage of dollars awarded compared to the dollars programmed for award in the same quarter of the current Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Additional Information: Cost Awarded vs. Programmed (Dollars in Millions, Percentages are the Percent Awarded/Projected versus Programmed)
From page 110...
... Percentage of projects delivered as programmed Strategic Goal: Deliver the STIP on time and within budget Performance Goal/Target: Deliver projects within 5% of the number of projects programmed Green - within 5% of the number of programmed projects Yellow - within 5% - 10% of the number of programmed projects Red - deviating more than 10% of the number of programmed projects Performance Measures: Percentage of the number of projects awarded in the same fiscal year programmed of the current Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Additional Information: SFY 2002 338338 49 79 308 0 100 200 300 400 Programmed in SFY 2002 at STIP Approval Added to Program - SFY 2002 Removed from Program - SFY 2002 Currently Programmed - SFY 2002 Awarded SFY to Date Finish What We've Started Desired Trend: 100% Results: (Y) Deviation was 9% for SFY 2002 Last Update: 6/04/2003 D-20
From page 111...
... Percentage of projects delivered on time Strategic Goal: Deliver the STIP on time and within budget Performance Goal/Target: Shorten the time allowed to complete a project and distribute project awards strategically throughout the year. Green - 85-100 percent on time Yellow - 75-85 percent on time Red - Less than 75 percent on time Performance Measures: Percentage of projects completed on time as specified in the project contract Additional Information: For the first six months of FY03, 70.4 percent of all projects have been completed on time (126 of 179)
From page 112...
... Percentage of projects delivered within budget Strategic Goal: Deliver the STIP on time and within budget Performance Goal/Target: To deliver good value for funds taxpayers invest in transportation Green < 3% of total programmed dollars Yellow >3 and < 5% of total programmed dollars Red >5% of programmed dollars Performance Measures: Percentage of the annual total dollars spent on completed projects compared to the total programmed dollars for the same projects Additional Information: 95.4% $333M/$349M 98.6% $532M/$540M 99.2% $594M/$597M 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 105% 110% SFY2000 SFY 2001 SFY 2002 % of Dollars Spent on Completed Projects Compared to Program Dollars Percentage of Number of Projects Completed According to Contract Time Compared to the Total Programmed Dollars for the Same Projects Desired Trend: 100% Results: (G) <3% of programmed dollars Last Update: 5/2003 Finish What We've Started D-22
From page 113...
... Percent of Customer Satisfaction Strategic Goal: Listen and respond to the public Performance Goal/Target: The goal is to increase customer satisfaction with the overall performance of MoDOT. Target is 70 percent.
From page 114...
... Percent of funding level target utilized by programmed projects by category for the 2005-2009 STIP Strategic Goal: Demonstrate responsible use of taxpayers' money Performance Goal/Target: Funds programmed for project delivery within 5% of the targets established by the approved funding distributions for each funding category for the current year. Green - funds programmed within 5% of each funding category Yellow - funds programmed within 5%-10% of each funding category Red - funds programmed deviate more than 10% of any funding category Performance Measures: Percent of funding level target utilized by programmed projects by category for the 2005-2009 STIP Additional Information: Performance data shown below is for 2004-2008 STIP.
From page 115...
... Distribution of funds Strategic Goal: Demonstrate responsible use of taxpayers' money Performance Goal/Target: More dollars will be spent on maintenance and construction of our transportation system than other activities. Green - The ratio of construction and maintenance expenditures is more than 1.5:1 of other appropriations.
From page 116...
... Revenue dispersion Strategic Goal: Demonstrate responsible use of taxpayers' money Performance Goal/Target: Awareness of revenue dispersion, which indicates how dependent the department is on revenue sources from other entities or revenues requiring voter approval Green - Revenue dispersion remains relatively constant Yellow - Revenue dispersion includes consistent declines in sources of funds Red - Revenue dispersion includes significant declines in one or more sources of funds Performance Measures: Revenue dispersion Additional Information: 459 482 469 496 495 155 172 173 186 170 244 237 286 262 260 66 91 94 46 110 9 11 31 16 13 470 642 631 831 695 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 PROJECTED FY 2003 In $ 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 Fuel Tax Sales and use tax Licenses, fees & permits Intergovernmental/cost reimbursements Investment and Interest Federal government Build Public Trust Desired Trend: Revenue dispersion will remain relatively constant. Results: (G)

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.