Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 76-87

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 76...
... 76 warrant requirements of the Fourth Amendment.333 H Genetic Testing 463 An article entitled Workplace Privacy and Discrimination Issues Related to Genetic Data: A Comparative Law Study of the European Union and the United States explains how employers may use samples of bodily fluids to obtain medical information on employees without their knowledge.334 XX.
From page 77...
... 77 2. EPA Enforcement and Civil Proceedings Under CERCLA 465 Liability and fines apportioned by the U.S.
From page 78...
... 78 Case 471 6. Railroads Not Liable Because They Were Not Owners or 471 Operators nor did They Create or Assist in Creating a Nuisance In Redevelopment Agency of City of Stockton, supra, Part XX.B.5, the Ninth Circuit also held that the railroads could not be held liable if they were not owners or operators within the meaning of the CERCLA definition incorporated in the state statute and if they had not created or assisted in creating the nuisance, unless they acted unreasonably in failing to recognize or stop it.343 Statutes 475 7.
From page 79...
... 79 Cases 475 10. Railroads May Bring Claim for Contribution Under CERCLA 475 and HSCA In Reading Co.
From page 80...
... 80 14. CERCLA in the Ninth Circuit 479 A 2012 law review article reviews some significant cases in the Ninth Circuit on environmental law and examines the application of CERCLA to railroads and other entities, such as manufacturers and maritime bodies.352 15.
From page 81...
... 81 3. Board Determinations on an Exemption Permit 484 STB "will issue a land-use-exemption permit only if it determines that the facility at the existing or proposed location would not pose an unreasonable risk to public health, safety, or the environment" and meets other requirements.356 Case 484 4.
From page 82...
... 82 "significant uncertainty" regarding the relationship of the ICCTA and the Clean Railroads Act on the issue.360 D Transportation of Hazardous Materials 491 Statutes and Regulations 491 1.
From page 83...
... 83 4. Federal Railroad Safety Act and Preemption of Local Law 493 In CSX Transportation, Inc.
From page 84...
... 84 5. Surface Transportation Board 498 STB is responsible for ensuring that railroads meet the requirements of NEPA for actions that are subject to NEPA and to the board's jurisdiction.370 6.
From page 85...
... 85 e. Environmental Impact Statement 504 NEPA requires that all federal agencies submit a "detailed statement" on the environmental impact of any proposed major federal action.376 Cases 505 6.
From page 86...
... 86 9. The STB's Authority to Impose Environmental Conditions on 510 Minor Mergers In Village of Barrington v.
From page 87...
... 87 13. Environmental Impact Statement Required to Consider 516 Socioeconomic Impacts on the Local Population In Saint Paul Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.