Railroad Legal Issues and Resources (2015) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 88-94
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 88... ...
88 Air Quality Management District had a rule that required idling trains to limit the amount of emissions they release to reduce air pollution. In Association of American Railroads v.
|
From page 89... ...
89 nonrailroad employee before the nonrailroad employee may be "deemed pro hac vice [an] employee[]
|
From page 90... ...
90 2. FELA, the Locomotive Inspection Act, and Federal Preclusion 530 A California federal district court in Glow v.
|
From page 91... ...
91 4. Low Standard for Evidence Required in FELA Cases 533 In Rivera v.
|
From page 92... ...
92 8. The Effect of Medical Insurance on the Amount of an 537 Employee's Recoverable Damages In Leighton v.
|
From page 93... ...
93 exhibiting physical manifestations as long as the individual is only seeking damages for asbestosis-related pain and suffering and the plaintiff's fear of developing cancer is "genuine and serious."422 2. Liability of a Railroad Under FELA for an Employee's Exposure 541 to a Toxic Substance In Norfolk & Western Ry.
|
From page 94... ...
94 2. Liability of a Railroad Under FELA Based on a Violation of 544 the FSAA In Strickland v.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.