Integrated Noise Model Accuracy for General Aviation Aircraft (2014) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 1-5
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 1... ...
Table 7 Aircraft selected for detailed departure analysis, see Figure 5.
|
From page 2... ...
1 Study Overview and Conclusions Goals 1.1 The original goals of the project were four: Assess INM Accuracy for General Aviation (GA) Aircraft – How well do INM calculated values of GA aircraft SEL values match measured SEL for selected types of GA aircraft?
|
From page 3... ...
climb thrust which are then used to modify INM departure data. With this approach, it is desirable to have empirical radar climb data and, if possible, noise monitoring data to verify correct modeling of these changed profiles.
|
From page 4... ...
INM. The two ATM methods, ATM1 and ATM2, described briefly above in Section 1.3.1and in detail in Section 8 both show promise, but this study recommends that ATM2 be implemented as a modeling procedure for INM users, Section 9.
|
From page 5... ...
Though many factors other than use of thrust can affect aircraft departure operations and hence climb rates and sound levels, it is the use of thrust that has the most effect in performance. Use of flaps, drag coefficient, airspeed, aircraft weight and pressure altitude all can affect performance.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.