Pilot Testing of the TCAPP Decision Guide and Related Capacity Products: Hoopstick Creek, South Carolina (2014) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 27-35
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 27... ...
Figure 2.3. Hoopstick Creek Bridge Replacement study area.
|
From page 28... ...
meeting at SCDHEC-OCRM offices to discuss ENV-6 and ENV-7 from the TCAPP Decision Guide. ENV-6: Discuss Full Range of Alternatives The goal of this key decision was to identify a full range of possible project alternatives to meet the purpose and need.
|
From page 29... ...
Figure 2.4. Full range of alternatives for Hoopstick Creek Bridge Replacement project.
|
From page 30... ...
Figure 2.5. Full range of alternative alignments for Hoopstick Creek Bridge Replacement project.
|
From page 31... ...
ENV-7: Approve Alternatives to Be Carried Forward The purpose of the ENV-7 key decision is to narrow the list of alternatives to be carried forward for more detailed analyses. The SCDOT's goal was to review the eight identified alternatives based on the environmental issues identified at the site visit and obtain approval from the partner agencies of alternatives to be carried forward.
|
From page 32... ...
Table 2.1. Impacts Analysis Impacts Alternative No-build #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 Replace on existing alignment and detour Staged construction (north)
|
From page 33... ...
Impacts Alternative No-build #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 Replace on existing alignment and detour Staged construction (north) Staged construction (south)
|
From page 34... ...
Key outcome: The group agreed that current processes do not establish a time to formally approve an alternative. The SCDOT asked the partner agencies if it was possible to obtain approval of a preferred alternative at this step in the process.
|
From page 35... ...
agencies could not approve avoidance and minimization measures without a detailed analysis of how much the impact would be reduced. Due to agencies' limitations in approving the avoidance and minimization measures specific to the Hoopstick Creek project, the project team discussed how such measures should be addressed in permit applications.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.