The National Academies Press

Currently Skimming:

Pages 94-108

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.

From page 94... ... 94 A p p e n d i x G Field Needs Survey Table G.1. Fill-Out Form for Ranking the Objectives for Spectroscopic Evaluation in the Field Category Material Category Objectives Scorea C1 Structural coatings and pavement markings Verification of chemical composition ("fingerprinting") Read the entire page →
From page 95... ... 95 Table G.2. Summary of Scores per Category from Fill-Out Form State Categorya Per State C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Mean SD Alabama 1 1 1 3 2 3 2 4 1 2 2.0 1.1 Alaska 4 1.5 4 1 1 2 3 3 3 3.5 2.6 1.1 Arizona 2 3 2 4 3 3 4 4 1 4 3.0 1.1 Arkansas 2 2 1 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 2.7 1.4 California 1 1 5 2 5 3 4 3 2 4 3.0 1.5 Colorado 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3.4 0.5 Connecticut 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1.9 1.4 Delaware 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.0 0.0 Florida 4 4 4 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.4 1.0 Georgia 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 4 2.8 1.0 Hawaii NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Idaho NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Illinois 4 3 3 2 3 2 4 4 1 3 2.9 1.0 Indiana NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Iowa 3 3 2 4 5 4 1 4 1 1 2.8 1.5 Kansas 2 2 2 5 2 5 5 5 2 2 3.2 1.5 Kentucky 2 4 4 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 2.8 0.8 Louisiana 5 5 4 4 3 5 5 4 3 5 4.3 0.8 Maine 4 3 3 3 2 4 5 5 5 5 3.9 1.1 Maryland 3 3 3 1 1 4 4 3 5 4 3.1 1.3 Massachusetts 5 3 3 3 3 5 5 3 3 5 3.8 1.0 Michigan NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Minnesota NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Mississippi 4 5 2 1 3 5 3 3 1 1 2.8 1.5 Missouri 3.5 3.5 3.5 4 3.5 3 3 3.3 2.3 3 3.3 0.5 Montana NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Nebraska 4 4 4 3 4 5 5 5 1 2 3.7 1.3 Nevada 2 2 2 4 3 3 5 3 5 5 3.4 1.3 New Hampshire NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA New Jersey 4 3 3 3 2 4 4 2 3 5 3.3 0.9 New Mexico NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA New York 4 4 3 3 5 3 3 4 2 3 3.4 0.8 North Carolina 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 4.8 0.6 North Dakota 5 5 2 3 3 4 4 2 2 2 3.2 1.2 Ohio 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1.6 1.0 Oklahoma 4 1 3 3 3 2 2 5 2 4 2.9 1.2 Oregon 3 1 3 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 2.9 1.4 (continued on next page) Read the entire page →
From page 96... ... 96 Table G.2. Summary of Scores per Category from Fill-Out Form State Categorya Per State C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 Mean SD Pennsylvania NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Rhode Island 5 5 5 3.5 3.5 4 4 4 4.5 5 4.4 0.6 South Carolina 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 2 2.9 0.6 South Dakota NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Tennessee NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Texas 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.1 0.3 Utah 4 3 2 1 1 3 3 1 4 4 2.6 1.3 Vermont NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Virginia NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA West Virginia NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Wisconsin NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Wyoming 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1.4 1.3 District of Columbia NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Mean 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.7 3.5 3.5 3.5 2.4 3.1 SD 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.5 Note: NA = not available. Read the entire page →
From page 97... ... 97 Figure G.1. Distribution of average score per state. Read the entire page →
From page 98... ... 98 Figure G.2. Distribution of scores for verification of chemical composition (fingerprinting) Read the entire page →
From page 99... ... 99 Figure G.3. Distribution of scores for verification of presence of solvents and diluents in structural coatings and pavement markings. Read the entire page →
From page 100... ... 100 Figure G.4. Distribution of scores for verification of chemical composition of epoxy adhesives. Read the entire page →
From page 101... ... 101 Figure G.5. Distribution of scores for verification of the presence of chemical admixtures in fresh or cured PCC. Read the entire page →
From page 102... ... 102 Figure G.6. Distribution of scores for verification of chemical composition and degree of cure (water content) Read the entire page →
From page 103... ... 103 Figure G.7. Distribution of scores for verification of type and class of polymer additives in asphalt products. Read the entire page →
From page 104... ... 104 Figure G.8. Distribution of scores for determination of polymer content in asphalt products. Read the entire page →
From page 105... ... 105 Figure G.9. Distribution of scores for verification of presence/type of antistripping agents in asphalt binders and mixtures. Read the entire page →
From page 106... ... 106 Figure G.10. Distribution of scores for verification of RAP presence in asphalt mixtures. Read the entire page →
From page 107... ... 107 Figure G.11. Distribution of scores for determination of RAP content in asphalt mixtures. Read the entire page →
From page 108... ... 108 Table G.3. Summary of Rankings of Material Categories per Objective by Spectroscopic Testing Material Category Objective Mean Score SD Rank Structural coatings and pavement markings Verification of chemical composition 3.05 1.38 2 Verification of the presence of solvents/diluents 2.73 1.41 3 Epoxy adhesives Verification of chemical composition 2.68 1.25 3 Portland cement concrete (PCC) Read the entire page →

From page 94...

... 94 A p p e n d i x G Field Needs Survey Table G.1. Fill-Out Form for Ranking the Objectives for Spectroscopic Evaluation in the Field Category Material Category Objectives Scorea C1 Structural coatings and pavement markings Verification of chemical composition ("fingerprinting")