Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 77-109

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 77...
... 77 Leading Revenue-Generation Options Development and evaluation of a revenue mechanism to fund freight infrastructure entails a multilevel series of choices and tradeoffs. At the highest level is the basis of fees or taxation itself -- the activities, assets, or transactions that will be taxed, tolled, or surcharged.
From page 78...
... 78 through a $0.001 per gallon excise tax on gasoline and other motor fuels, which produced $188 million in 2009. Revenue is collected through the Highway Trust Fund (highway and rail)
From page 79...
... 79 investment efforts. There is very limited evidence, however, on the amount of new private investment that is induced by ITCs.
From page 80...
... 80 Federal Collection and Enforcement Costs Estimates of federal collection and enforcement costs are summarized in Table 52. The lowest estimates are for the diesel fuel taxes with non-freight tax refunds, because that option uses the existing fuel tax system.
From page 81...
... 81 Table 53 provides estimates of these adjustments and net federal revenue for 2012, assuming pass-through to customers is complete by then. The results are shown graphically in Figure 11.
From page 82...
... Table 53. Revenue targets and net revenue.
From page 83...
... 83 The loss of revenue is limited by the underlying inelasticity of demand for freight transportation. As the economic impacts and analysis suggest, the adverse impact on commodity production and consumption would be relatively small.
From page 84...
... 84 Table 54. Forecasts of U.S.
From page 85...
... 85 Table 55. Long-term revenue estimates.
From page 86...
... 86 Figure 13. The impacts of inflation and fuel economy on federal motor fuel taxes.
From page 87...
... 87 Figure 14. Comparison of highway construction cost indexes.
From page 88...
... Table 57. Implementation cost estimates.
From page 89...
... 89 net present value (NPV)
From page 90...
... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NPV Diesel fuel tax with non-freight refunds -$ 4,995$ 4,995$ 4,995$ 4,995$ 4,995$ 4,995$ 4,995$ 4,995$ 4,995$ 33,812$ Diesel/gas tax with non-freight refunds -$ 4,757$ 4,757$ 4,757$ 4,757$ 4,757$ 4,757$ 4,757$ 4,757$ 4,757$ 32,202$ Diesel fuel tax with vehicle ID (300)
From page 91...
... 91 implementation and collection costs that dilute their revenue-generating effectiveness. • The lowest ratio is for the diesel/gas fuel tax with tax refunds since it would require the great majority of vehicle owners -- about 240 million -- to file for refunds.
From page 92...
... Annual Industry Cost (billion) Ratio $/Gal Net Annual Federal Revenue (billion)
From page 93...
... 93 For all three candidate mechanisms, low-tech implementation approaches result in lower implementation, collection, and compliance costs; shorter implementation timelines; and greater revenue-generation efficiency. In all three cases, low-tech collection methods could build on existing systems.
From page 94...
... 94 Table 63. 2008 estimated vehicle counts.
From page 95...
... 95 tor in the need for infrastructure capacity and in the wear and tear on roads. Most highway vehicles would rarely travel significant distances off public roads, but there are obvious exceptions for vehicles used in agriculture, resource extraction (e.g., mining and lumber)
From page 96...
... 96 • If graduated by size or weight, an annual registration fee could encourage users to choose the smallest (and presumably most fuel-efficient and lowest-emissions) truck that will perform the task at hand.
From page 97...
... 97 trucks; in reality, the truck population includes a wide range of vehicles used for many purposes. This issue is treated at greater length in Appendix B
From page 98...
... 98 service vehicles have been used in the past for urban delivery and will likely become a practical possibility with continued advances in battery technology. Applying fuel taxes to electricity is difficult.
From page 99...
... 99 trips within Mexico are a mirror image, handled by Mexican truckers to and from drop lots south of the border. Under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
From page 100...
... 100 In 2007, ATRI estimated an overall fuel tax revenue loss of $900 million annually due to these exemptions, as shown in Table 68. The federal portion was $570 million.
From page 101...
... 101 agencies, funding fees would presumably entail offsetting increases across the whole mix of federal revenue sources. Unless federal agencies accepted a net budget loss, the impact of federal agency freight fees would be spread across the general population.
From page 102...
... 102 trucking industry, whose members would bear the brunt of the increase. ATA has also proposed an increase in the diesel tax and tied it to proposals to reduce diversion, reduce evasion, and narrow exemptions.
From page 103...
... 103 Table 70. 2005 Mineta Institute survey findings.
From page 104...
... 104 Table 71. Mineta Institute study summary of mileage tax survey results.
From page 105...
... 105 Figure 17. Results from Mineta Institute survey.
From page 106...
... 106 Table 72. MBUF public opinion study results.
From page 107...
... 107 Table 73. Support for vehicle registration fees.
From page 108...
... 108 There are marked differences in implementation time and cost, with the high-tech variations on VMT fees and fuel tax surcharges taking longer and costing more. A federal registration fee would be the quickest and least expensive option.
From page 109...
... 109 the industry has recently experienced. Freight and service truck operators already have stronger cost incentives to minimize mileage and fuel use, so any new incentives would be slight.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.