Identification of Utility Conflicts and Solutions (2012) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 16-23
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 16... ...
16 C h a p t e r 3 Introduction This chapter documents the results of an analysis to produce a prototype stand-alone UCM based on the results of the survey, follow-up interviews, and a review of data items from the sample documents provided by the states. The purpose of this effort was to develop a UCM that is compact (while at the same time useful to state DOTs)
|
From page 17... ...
17 these data sources. Table 3.3 shows the result of the composite ranking.
|
From page 18... ...
18 conflicts. Different options are possible for developing the cost estimate sheet that essentially follow a one-to-many relationship between it and the main UCM.
|
From page 19... ...
19 might involve different teams or stakeholders)
|
From page 20... ...
20 Figure 3.2. Prototype UCM.
|
From page 21... ...
21 Project Owner: Cost Estimate Analysis Developed/Revised By: Project No.: Date: Project Description: Reviewed By: Highway or Route: Date: Utility Conflict: Utility Owner: Utility Type: Size and/or Material: Project Phase: Alternative Number Alternative Advantage Alternative Disadvantage Responsible Party Engineering Cost (Utility) Direct Cost (Utility)
|
From page 22... ...
22 Table 3.4. UCM Column or Field Definitions (continued)
|
From page 23... ...
23 • Complete the UCM up to the column that identifies the type of utility investigation needed. • For each conflict, determine the type of utility investigation needed.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.