Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 53-66

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 53...
...   Relationship Between Roller-Based stiffness and in situ Response c h a p t e r 4 This chapter explores the relationship between rollermeasured stiffness and in situ stress-strain-modulus behavior. Numerous vertically homogeneous embankments and layered subgrade/subbase/base TBs were instrumented with stress and strain sensors at multiple levels to capture in situ behavior during static and vibratory roller passes.
From page 55...
...   4.2 Measurement Depth in Vertically Homogeneous Embankments Roller MVs from typical highway construction earthwork rollers (11 to 15 tons) measure to depths significantly greater than a typical 15- to 30-cm (6- to 12-in)
From page 56...
...  Figure 4.3.
From page 57...
...   Figure 4.4.
From page 58...
...  rule of thumb reported in the literature (e.g., Anderegg and Kaufmann 2004)
From page 59...
...   enced by the soil response in the x and y directions. Similarly, a vertical dynamic deformation modulus M can be extracted from the cyclic in situ σ z -ε z response to vibratory loading.
From page 60...
... 0 Figure 4.6. Total roller-induced (a)
From page 61...
...   Figure 4.7.
From page 62...
...  Figure 4.9.
From page 63...
...   fluenced by a number of factors including stress-dependent modulus of each material, drum/soil contact width, the stiffness ratios of the involved layers, and roller/soil dynamics. The topic is not fully understood and is an area of ongoing research.
From page 64...
...  tures are a function of layer thickness, the relative stiffness of the layers, vibration amplitude or F ev , and other drum/soil interaction factors. This section addresses the instrumented roller's ability to sense stiff layers atop a softer subsurface, i.e., to what degree are roller MVs representative of a relatively thin layer or lift of base or subbase material atop subgrade?
From page 65...
...   80 MPa throughout compaction, while E LWD-P3 increases from about 75 MPa after the second pass to 90 MPa after the sixth (and final) pass for the first lift of base material.
From page 66...
...  4.5 Conclusions The following conclusions can be drawn from the results presented in this chapter. • Vibratory and static rolling induces a complex threedimensional stress-strain-modulus state in the soil.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.