Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 115-154

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 115...
... Appendix B Design Examples
From page 116...
... B-1   B.1 MULTI-SPAN PRECAST CONCRETE GIRDER MADE CONTINUOUS WITH COMPOSITE DECK This is one of the most common types of structures used for freeway bridges and overpasses. This three-span precast/prestressed girder example features a single long span in the middle along with two short side spans, as shown in Figure B-1.
From page 117...
... B-2   Material properties ksif c 5.7'  (girders) ksif ci 5.5'  (girders)
From page 118...
... B-3   inh f 6 (compression flange) 433.26 ftI nc  (non-composite section)
From page 119...
... B-4   ftkM PCDL  27 ftkM deck  408 ftkM DCADL  38 ftkM DWADL  60 ftkM HL  036,193 9375.165.09.0) (25.1   HLDWADLDCADLdeckPCDLSWStrengthIu MMMMMMM 036,175.1)
From page 120...
... B-5   ksi I yeP A P f nc nc bncf nc f cpe 166.11233.26 6.3610.34325 1233.5 325 42   3 4 279,20 38.55 1216.54 in y IS c b c c  ftkMMMM deckPCDLSWndc   78940827354 3 4 917,14 6.36 1233.26 in y IS nc b nc nc  ftkM fcr  638,3)
From page 121...
... B-6   ftk baf dfAM fcppsps ps n  010,312) 2 12913.15.485.0787.268736.1( 2 '85.0 22 The section is tension-controlled and 00.1 ftkM psn  010,3010,300.1 ftkMftkM StrengthIu ps n  623,333.1010,3 so additional strands are required.
From page 122...
... B-7     Figure B-2. Moment Profiles for the Precast Girder Example
From page 124...
... B-9   B.2 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE BOX GIRDER A three-span cast-in-place concrete box girder bridge that is commonly built in California and Nevada is the subject of this design example. As with the first example, the side spans are far shorter than the end spans while the depth of the bridge is constant for along the entire length.
From page 125...
... B-10   ksif c 4'  ksiEc 644,3 ksif y 60 ksiEs 000,29 ksif pu 270 ksiE ps 500,28 Prestress Forces The allowable tension stress is limited to 0 under permanent loads and 0.19 cf ' (ksi) under the sum of the permanent and live loads.
From page 126...
... B-11   inbw 72 403.538 ftI  278.90 ftA  inyb 96.40 (distance from section CG to bottom fiber) iny t 04.37 (distance from section CG to top fiber)
From page 127...
... B-12   ftk baf dfAM fcppsps ps n  586,4012) 2 34205.7485.090.629.26762.30( 2 '85.0 22 005.001973.03 ps  the section is tension-controlled and 95.0 ftkMftkM StrengthIIu ps n  830,43557,38586,4095.0 so mild steel is required.
From page 128...
... B-13   Also, the net tensile strain is greater than 0.0075, which satisfies Article 5.7.3.5 for redistribution. Therefore, per the proposed revised Article 5.7.3.3.2, minimum reinforcement is not required to be checked for negative bending.
From page 129...
... B-14   iny t 89.32 (distance from section CG to top fiber) Minimum reinforcement by the Modified LRFD Method: fcrn MM  where  SffM cperfcr )
From page 130...
... B-15   At decompression: 00014.0)
From page 131...
... B-16     Figure B-4. CIP Box Girder Moment Profiles
From page 132...
... B-17   B.3 SPAN-BY-SPAN SEGMENTAL BRIDGE WITH EXTERNAL TENDONS INTRODUCTION A two-span precast segmental bridge is the subject of this design example. The bridge is built using the span-by-span construction method.
From page 133...
... B-18   Figure B-6. Cross section (Span 2)
From page 134...
... B-19   ksif y 60 ksiEs 000,29 ksif pu 270 ksiE ps 500,28 PRESTRESS DESIGN For precast segmental bridges with no bonded reinforcement or bonded tendons crossing the joints, no tensile stresses are allowed at all segment-to-segment joints under service loads. Longitudinal analysis and design of this bridge included concrete stresses under service loads, flexural capacity, shear capacity, principal stresses in the box girder webs and minimum flexural reinforcement requirements.
From page 135...
... B-20   Figure B-8. Cracking Moment, Factored Moment and Flexural Capacity of a Precast Segmental Span-By-Span Bridge Example Analysis of this bridge was done using LARSA 4D.
From page 136...
... B-21   TGTUIHLSSecPDWDC StrengthI uu MMMMMMMM 50.050.075.100.150.125.1 93/   )
From page 137...
... B-22   Depth of compression zone: Assume ksifksif pyps 243228  in bf fA c fc psps 53.2 85.0 1 '   Depth of neutral axis is smaller than deck thickness. Thus, use of equations for rectangular sections is justified.
From page 138...
... B-23   ftkMftkxSff ucpecr  826,45142,4912 663,215)
From page 139...
... B-24   Figure B-9. Variation of Cracking Moment, Factored Moment and Moment Capacity with Number of Strands in External Tendons It is interesting to note that with the current AASHTO LRFD MFR requirements, the curve representing minimum design moment in Figure B-9 does not intersect with the curve representing the moment capacity, which indicates that no convergence may be obtained to satisfy the MFR by increasing the number of strands (unless 1.33Mu controls the MFR requirement)
From page 140...
... B-25   B.4 BALANCED CANTILEVER BRIDGE WITH INTERNAL TENDONS INTRODUCTION A four-span precast segmental bridge is the subject of this design example. The bridge is built using the cantilever construction method.
From page 141...
... B-26   Figure B-11. Cross section (Span 2)
From page 142...
... B-27   Figure B-13. Tendon Layout for the Precast Segmental Cantilever Bridge Design Example SPECIFICATIONS This example is designed based on the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 4th Edition, 2007.
From page 143...
... B-28   and minimum flexural reinforcement requirements. At the first segment-to-segment joint next to Pier 8-3 in Span 4 (most critical section for negative moment)
From page 144...
... B-29   use of the Modified LRFD method significantly reduces the required MFR design moment compared to the current AASHTO LRFD provisions. For sections away from the supports, the minimum design moment according to the Modified LRFD method controls over 1.33Mu, whereas 1.33Mu controls MFR for sections near the supports.
From page 145...
... B-30   ftkM LT  842,1 Long-term effects (concrete creep & shrinkage and relaxation of prestressing steel) ftkM SSecP  000,25/ Secondary effects from prestressing ftkM TU  2 Uniform temperature rise ftkM TG  628,1 Temperature gradient ftkM IHL  727,793 TGTU IHLSSecPLTDWDC StrengthI uu MM MMMMMMM 50.050.0 75.100.150.050.125.1 93/    )
From page 146...
... B-31   infth 1089  The sacrificial surface is included as external load only inh f 0.9 (minimum thickness of compression flange for negative moment section) inh f 5.9 (minimum thickness of compression flange for positive moment section)
From page 147...
... B-32   Effective length of external tendons: ft N l l i i e 33.100) 2( 2  Depth of compression zone: Assume ksifksif pyps 243182  in d f Akbf fAfAfA c p pu psfc yspspspups 22.25 85.0 1 11 ' 221     (k = 0.28 for low-relaxation strands)
From page 148...
... B-33   Section B: Section at Maximum Positive Moment in Span 4: Prestressing tendons at this section is composed of external (unbonded) tendons only.
From page 149...
... B-34   Minimum reinforcement by the proposed method (Modified LRFD) : Section B: Section at Maximum Positive Moment in Span 4:   fcrn MM  or un MM 33.1 ; where SffM cpecrfcr )
From page 150...
... B-35   B.5 CAP BEAM DESCRIPTION OF CAP The cap beam has a main span of 23 ft and 2 cantilever spans of 12.5 ft each. The cap is 6.5 ft wide and 6 ft deep.
From page 151...
... B-36   ksiEc 644,3 ksif y 60 ksiEs 000,29 MOMENT DIAGRAMS Figure B-17. Cap Beam Design Example Strength limit bending moments At the inside face of support (negative moment)
From page 152...
... B-37   Section properties: infth 726  inftb 785.6  4117 ftI  239 ftA  iny t 36 (distance from section CG to top fiber) Required flexural reinforcement: )
From page 153...
... B-38   9375.165.09.0  HLDWDCStrengthIu MMMM )
From page 154...
... B-39   9375.150.125.1  HLDWDCStrengthIu MMMM )

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.