Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 3-7

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 3...
... 1   SUMMARY Introduction Minimum flexural reinforcement is prescribed in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (also referred to as the "LRFD specifications") for reinforced and prestressed concrete members to reduce the probability of brittle failure (AASHTO, 2007)
From page 4...
... 2   2. Evaluate minimum reinforcement models and select 4-candidates for parametric studies.
From page 5...
... 3   should substantially lower than the flexural cracking stress from a modulus of rupture test made from the same concrete. A review of US and international practice on specifying minimum reinforcement has shown that all methods investigated are based on a similar premise, which is providing flexural strength in excess of the cracking strength of concrete by an acceptable margin.
From page 6...
... 4   Conclusions Specifying minimum flexure reinforcement should be based on a rational approach to prevent brittle failures of concrete bridge members. This approach should recognize that lightly reinforced and prestressed concrete members have significant strength and ductility in the postcracked state.
From page 7...
... 5   Recommendations The Modified LRFD method is recommended to replace the current minimum reinforcement provisions in the LRFD specifications. This method:  specifies flexural cracking strengths and appropriate factors that are based on smallscale flexure tests specimens cured under conditions that represent actual concrete bridge girder construction and large scale test specimens.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.