Integrating the Priorities of Transportation Agencies and Utility Companies (2009) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 59-65
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 59... ...
59A P P E N D I X A Annotated BibliographyAlabama Department of Transportation. Alabama Utilities Manual, 1999.
|
From page 60... ...
60Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, Arkansas State Highway Commission. Arkansas Utility Accommodation Policy, http://www.arkansashighways.com/ ROW/Utility%20Accommodation%20Policy.pdf?
|
From page 61... ...
61Colorado Department of Transportation. Highway Utility Manual, Jan.
|
From page 62... ...
62This paper reports on a preliminary study for the Florida Department of Transportation to help determine the best placement of utility facilities during the planning stages for new transportation corridors and modification of corridors either by the addition of new facilities or relocation of existing facilities. The paper describes a model that considers minimum cover, clearance, and vertical and horizontal position, in order to minimize the sum of all utility location-dependent costs.
|
From page 63... ...
63The survey identified five common techniques and case studies from Florida and North Carolina that demonstrate that the design–build approach successfully relocated utilities in the highway right-of-way. Najafi, F
|
From page 64... ...
64South Carolina Department of Transportation. Utility Involvement in South Carolina Design–Build Projects, 2007.
|
From page 65... ...
65U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO)
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.