Skip to main content

Guide for Pavement Friction (2009) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:


Pages 170-186

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 171...
... C-2 INTRODUCTION This appendix summarizes the responses provided by state highway agencies that participated in the pavement friction survey conducted in August 2003. PROCEDURES AND EQUIPMENT USED TO MEASURE PAVEMENT SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS Pavement Friction Test Protocol/Procedure Forty-one of the 45 responding agencies indicated using ASTM E 274 ("Test Method for Skid Resistance of Paved Surfaces Using a Full-Scale Tire")
From page 172...
... C-3 Table C-1. Test tires used as part of ASTM E 274 pavement surface friction testing.
From page 173...
... C-4 Frequency of Calibration of Test Equipment As seen in table C-2, there was a wide range of responses concerning the frequency of calibration of test equipment. The responses include both local calibrations of system components (force plate, water flow, etc.)
From page 174...
... C-5 Table C-3. Summary of test methods performed to characterize pavement–tire noise.
From page 175...
... C-6 Table C-4. Summary of test methods performed to characterize pavement–tire noise (continued)
From page 176...
... C-7 Pavement Surface Texture Test Methods Table C-4 summarizes test methods used by the 45 responding agencies to characterize pavement surface texture. The table shows that about half (23)
From page 177...
... C-8 Table C-5. Frequency of pavement surface texture testing.
From page 178...
... C-9 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS FOR ENSURING HIGH-FRICTION, LOWNOISE PAVEMENTS (NEW AND RESTORED) Pavement Friction Aggregate Properties and Tests The vast majority of states (41 of 45)
From page 179...
... C-10 Table C-6. Summary of test properties used in aggregate selection.
From page 180...
... C-11 Table C-7. Summary of the surface material requirements and finishing specifications.
From page 181...
... C-12 Table C-8. Agency methods for PCC finishing/texturing.
From page 182...
... C-13 This table shows that 37 of the 45 agencies specify tining as a finishing method for new PCC surfaces. Twenty-one states specify burlap or Astroturf drag techniques, mostly in conjunction with tining, while 25 states use grooving or grinding on either new or existing PCC pavement.
From page 183...
... C-14 Table C-9. Trigger values used in identifying potential friction-deficient locations.
From page 184...
... C-15 Table C-10. Summary of treatments used to restore pavement surface friction.
From page 185...
... C-16 Table C-11. Textures specified for noise in PCC design.
From page 186...
... C-17 SAFETY AND LEGAL ISSUES RELATED TO FRICTION/TEXTURE AND CRASH RATES Agency Practices Relating Friction to Crashes Although several states compare wet-weather crash rates with friction test results to determine if a site needs remedial action, only a few have investigated the relationship on a broad scale. Texas and North Carolina reported finding no direct correlation between friction and crashes.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.